Question: How long to get listed in dmoz

Discussion in 'ODP / DMOZ' started by Dlouhane, Jun 10, 2006.

  1. #1
    It has been over a month and I have not been listed in DMOZ nor given a rejection email. How long does it take to get listed?
     
    Dlouhane, Jun 10, 2006 IP
  2. fryman

    fryman Kiss my rep

    Messages:
    9,604
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    370
  3. sarahk

    sarahk iTamer Staff

    Messages:
    28,812
    Likes Received:
    4,535
    Best Answers:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    665
    #3
    You won't get a rejection email.

    It may take years

    Don't resubmit

    Work on your site

    Build your links elsewhere
     
    sarahk, Jun 10, 2006 IP
    brizzie likes this.
  4. phoenixcarpet

    phoenixcarpet Peon

    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Its been 14 months for me and still nothing, so dont hold your breath. Im not even in a hard keyword area.
     
    phoenixcarpet, Jun 11, 2006 IP
  5. CReed

    CReed Prominent Member

    Messages:
    3,969
    Likes Received:
    595
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #5
    Not to feel bad - no one's in a hurry to review my submissions either. :D j/k

    Did you submit to a regional category?
     
    CReed, Jun 11, 2006 IP
  6. gboisseau

    gboisseau Peon

    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    49
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    FYI, your site would only be listable in Regional - http://dmoz.org/Regional/North_Amer...onomy/Construction_and_Maintenance/Janitorial . (if your company is actually located in Pheonix) The problem is that there needs to be proof that the company has a bricks and mortar presence to verify the locality. I have gone through your site and do not find the physical address of your compnay. As it stands - this site is not listable.
     
    gboisseau, Jun 11, 2006 IP
  7. brizzie

    brizzie Peon

    Messages:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    178
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Consumer rule of thumb - don't use a tradesman who wants your address but won't give you his...
     
    brizzie, Jun 12, 2006 IP
  8. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #8
    1. Why would anyone want to advertise a cleaning service for Phoenix if he wasn't in Phoenix?

    2. If for some unfathomable reason he did want to lie about offering cleaning services for Phoenix residents when in fact he only operated in Boston or Dallas, how would placing his address on his web site be proof that he was indeed in Phoeniz anyway?
     
    minstrel, Jun 12, 2006 IP
  9. lmocr

    lmocr Peon

    Messages:
    492
    Likes Received:
    85
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    It is the practice in Regional to place businesses in the locality where the business office is (there are some minor exceptions to this general rule). So is this business located in Pheonix or Santa Maria or Hyde Park Lodge or Alhambra or ......? We don't know because the information isn't available on the site.

    If the owner told us where the business is located (and didn't update the site) - it still can't be used, because only the information contained on the sites can be used to describe and place sites.
     
    lmocr, Jun 12, 2006 IP
  10. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #10
    Once again, missing the point and misunderstanding the question... and therefore answering a question unasked with information already known.

    "She plunged into a sea of platitudes, and with the powerful breast stroke of a channel swimmer, made her confident way towards the white cliffs of the obvious." ~ W. Somerset Maugham
     
    minstrel, Jun 12, 2006 IP
  11. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #11
    Because usually there is 2 way of doing things, the right way and the DMOZ way. There are many stupid guidelines that make no sense at all, as we previously noticed with the name of web site and the discussion about summer's web site.
    Even when a profession is regulated by government such as Real estate agents, DMOZ refuses to recognize the license issued by a professional or government agency and instead let an editor that has no knowledge in that business to decide if that person has the right to exercise his profession. :rolleyes:
     
    gworld, Jun 12, 2006 IP
  12. CReed

    CReed Prominent Member

    Messages:
    3,969
    Likes Received:
    595
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #12
    Do editors look for reasons to include sites when they review them, or do they strictly look for reasons to exclude them?
     
    CReed, Jun 12, 2006 IP
  13. ishfish

    ishfish Peon

    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    ishfish, Jun 12, 2006 IP
    minstrel likes this.
  14. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #14
    You are dangerously getting too close to being logical and reasonable which is against DMOZ policies, be careful. ;) :)
     
    gworld, Jun 12, 2006 IP
  15. nebuchadrezzar

    nebuchadrezzar Peon

    Messages:
    645
    Likes Received:
    59
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    Neither commonsense nor the ODP guidelines say that a site like this must be listed in a locality.
    The concern is that some webmasters create a stable of nearly identical sites with geographical differentiation to obtain as much exposure as possible. This reluctance to list sites that are vague about the location of their actual business is a result of that.
     
    nebuchadrezzar, Jun 13, 2006 IP
    brizzie and compostannie like this.
  16. minstrel

    minstrel Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    15,082
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #16
    If a site is selling shirts or cheap drugs over the net, that might make sense. If you're selling a physical at-home service, as is the case with a carpet cleaning service, that makes no sense.

    This is another case of a DMOZ policy forumulated by and defended by people with little or no knowledge of either the web or the subject matter.
     
    minstrel, Jun 13, 2006 IP
  17. compostannie

    compostannie Peon

    Messages:
    1,693
    Likes Received:
    347
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    Generally, we list regional sites based on the area they serve if it's a company that goes to the consumer to provide a service. I agree with ishfish, this site belongs in Phoenix Metro.

    Phoenixcarpet, I think you may have submitted to the wrong category, do you remember which category you submitted to? Missubmitted sites always take longer and I couldn't find you anywhere so I went ahead and listed you in Phoenix_Metro.
     
    compostannie, Jun 13, 2006 IP
  18. ishfish

    ishfish Peon

    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    28
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    ishfish, Jun 13, 2006 IP
  19. compostannie

    compostannie Peon

    Messages:
    1,693
    Likes Received:
    347
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    Yes, ish, I think you're right. From what I've seen in the unreviewed Phoenix Metro sites it appears as though an editor is working on moving them. ;)
     
    compostannie, Jun 13, 2006 IP
  20. gworld

    gworld Prominent Member

    Messages:
    11,324
    Likes Received:
    615
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #20
    LOL, while ...... in RZ are losing all relevance in regard to DMOZ, DP is becoming the unofficial / official DMOZ forum. ;) :D
     
    gworld, Jun 13, 2006 IP