Of course not avoiding india but preferring countries like Pakistan and giving conditions on N-Deal in india.
lol Helvetti, why do we need attention of US anywayz @alvoor, records don't show u the mind games and other stuffs, not everything is done on records
So, you know mind reading? When have you read the minds Chinese leaders? I have already exposed your silly mind reading and assumptive arguments about Indo-US trade being bigger than that of Sino -US. And what's the point in reiterating Helvetti's comment again?
I would not say that the U.S. "prefers" Pakistan to India. If you polled Americans, I believe that most would have a positive view of India (except for the Union people). I believe that most Americans have a negative view of Pakistan (except for those who would like to see Times Square blown to pieces). But, Afghanistan is landlocked, so the U.S. has to deal with Pakistan right now. The U.S. has committed to supporting freedom for the people of Afghanistan and that means dealing with the less than honorable men who rule Pakistan.
I also won't say that America prefers Pakistan over India but you can see that Pakistan which sends and supports terrorists and is often rumoured to hide many terrorists gives a comparitively less preferrence but it should be giving even less to such a country. By the way i am not sad it avoids India i am unhappy USA gives such whooping donations to such countries.
No one is crying about US not giving to attention to India. It is much more stronger without these donations as compared to Pakistan. The sad thing is that this whooping amount is going to Pakistan which is then going to terrorists for destruction against other countries.
This is rather too simplistic of ways to understand international relationships. Diplomacy has much more to it than meets the eyes and particularly so in times of dealing with two of your enemies. US has Afghanistan on one hand and on the other it has to deal with terrorist countries like Pakistan and Iraq while risking its own hands and probably head too. I, for one, don't under estimate the weight one US warning to Pak against using the free military aid the wrong way. Otherwise I know for sure that Pak, which has enough military hardware to wage a long war against India, wouldn't be resorting to low intensity conflicts or concealed jihad.
You think part of this aid is not channeled to this jihad? Pakistan is way too smarter than you think
Ha ha. This is what I am exactly saying. That they are only using a part of the US aid against India when they would like to use all of it in all likelihood.
when the hell did I saw Sino-US trade was smaller compared to Indo-US. Don't put words in my mouth. Try to understand the phrase rather than trying to sensationalize the statements You don't need to be a mind reader to extract/understand or know how the lobbying is done at the backhand. watz ur prob with backing up Helvetti, feel abandoned ? *give respect and take respect. peace!!!
Thats a good to gives a two billion dollars to pakistan for Aid but I hope thats money is use for good thing rather than goes to corruption.
Up to $1 Billion in U.S. Aid Winds Up In Taliban Coffers As much as $1 billion in U.S. aid has been diverted from programs meant to stabilize Afghanistan and has wound up in the hands of the Taliban and other insurgency groups, war analysts and government auditors say. In fact, they say, graft has gotten so bad that the U.S. government estimates that only about 10 percent of the aid budget actually reaches the people in Afghanistan who need it.
Maaf karna bhai, Ghussa sehat ke liye acha nahi hei. Meine tumhe kitne baar kaahan hei ki tum bade ho, mei chota hu? Kyo tumhara ghussa mujhpe utaar rahe ho? (Forgive me brother, but anger isn't good for helath. And how many times have I accepted that you are more learned than I am? Please don't be angry on me.) And just this, there is ever for me to tell you India is "the biggest" market US is ever gonna get for most of its trade its vice versa too. (quoted from your earlier post)
Even George Bush wasn't so aid blind. Arming a rogue state is not a good idea at all (refer to the recent link I posted in the baluchistan violence thread)
It's not two billion its 1 billion and that's not going to lessen the pain and misery of Pakistan but this aid will surely enhance it. It would have been a better option to give it to someone alse where at least 50% of the money would have been proccessed rightly.
lol I can understand hindi very well I am getting sick of watching the topics on Indo-Pak constantly in this PR. Its getting frustrating to say the least. One or the other starts a fresh thread on same debacle again and again. I was referring "is gonna get" , that means India hasn't been a big market for them yet as China is. If US trades Nukes and Tech, it will be the biggest market, China is not going to buy US technology but India might. Its the same reason I mentioned to understand my statement I am not angry on u a fellow Indian (Brahmana is an exception though ) some threads on just Indo-Pak issues (in first few pages of PR, all relating to India or Pakistan and there have been blame game on the threads at least once on the topic): http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1935306 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1959240 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1980992 http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1946883 let peace prevail !!!
Look at their titles and also the title of this thread. They are not indo-pak issues, they are seperate country issue and this one is also seperate one about Pakistan only. So what kind of topics do you want Muslim leader kills poeple. Atheist kills his son. Christian mother kills husband. These are the kind of threads that are mostly found more than this. This thread discusses about the threat the world gets with this deal and 2 billion is a lot of money to get some serious destruction. So stay on the topic. Also save your last line as your signature because you always end your post with that. It will surely save some extra work.