![]() |
|
|
|
||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
on Matt Cutts Blog he officially states the new direction Google will be going in with the lauch of the BigDaddy Test Datacenter.
They also ask for feedback to be sent to Google about the Overall Quaility.
__________________
VIP Celebrity Bodyguards Forums |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Signatures are lame |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
50 ways to stuff up a Press Release |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
All my sites have way more indexed pages there...
__________________
Signatures are lame |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I figure there is no point in getting excited till its more fully developed. I don't see major changes from the live center to this one *shrugs*
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is no change in serps... but I would like to get the indexed pages rolled out
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
While I am happy to see this, they waited way too long... allowed too much damage. The post on 302 redirects is interesting, most I have seen had a 'worse' url than the hijacked domain. Perhaps this is the change, to simply show the 'better looking' url... it would stop alot of them.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Guys,
I notice that my website ranks higher on the bigdaddy test servers. Here's a question I have for you all - assuming that these are the results that will roll out, do you think the rankings could change significantly in the next month or two on those servers and if so what could cause this? Older links getting out of the link age filter and counting, as time goes on? Since one of my sites is #5 on the test servers, I am trying to in part figure out if I can get it to #1 just before the servers go live Energizer |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt Cutts said
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Update from Matt Cutts: To view the "Big Daddy" results, go to 66.249.93.104. That is the more reliable datacenter.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
New Google Datacenter "BigDaddy"
Saw this post over at sitepoint today and after checking some site: commands im a little worried as far as my coop weight goes. Digital point only had about half of the indexed pages it currently has.
Quote:
__________________
Butterfly Jigs. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Signatures are lame |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I feel really stupid as I looked for a post before posting. I will write 1000x
I will search before posting .. Thanks fryman
__________________
Butterfly Jigs. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is anyone else noticing that static links might be more valuable on the new datacenter? There was talk about the new bot having different indexing characteristics, and that might be one of them.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have noticed something else about the test DCs they do seem to roll back data at certain times. I found something else yesterday that was interesting. On a search I did it showed the cache date on Jan 4th but when I clicked cache it showed Dec 28th. Go Figure. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
If they are combining pages - then does that mean that PR will be more focused to less pages? hmmm... more juice from our IBL's?
__________________
My Plate Is Full I Am Not Accepting Any SEO Projects At This Time. If You Would Like To Be Put On A Waiting List PM Me. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| google datacenter in postinfo please? | iconrate | Suggestions & Feedback | 1 | Nov 20th 2005 7:53 am |
| Does datacenter IP matter in non .com google? | Johnburk | 7 | Aug 30th 2005 10:37 am | |
| Google Datacenter versus Library | chiefshuddle | 3 | Jul 18th 2005 9:37 am | |
| Anyway to track google bls across datacenter? | Juls | All Other Tools | 1 | Mar 7th 2005 4:57 pm |
| Google Bizzare Technology | ! ! | 3 | May 15th 2004 9:47 am | |