Zionist Plan to Manipulate Wikipedia Exposed! Credibility of Wikipedia under Threat!

Freedom fighter and want to do expect from occupying their land?

 

1. Gaza isn't under occupation! and i don't remember the last time that "innocent" man got killed in Judea and Samaria (West Bank).
stop lie!

2. it's not their land.

 

so settlements in west bank are ok?

I agree, Im not suprised the zionists will get to wikipedia like that, it will be only a matter of time. - Personally it only goes to show....

Most of the list of zionist jewish business people that had theere Biographies on wikipedia have been removed, even the ones that had evidential quotes from the Israeli newspaper Har'etz (or how ever you spell it)

 

So they have deeds for this land?

 

we were talking about Gaza.

the settlements in Judea and Samaria are more then OK.
they started a war, they lost, why we need to apologize?

 

Jews run everything. You already told us how they deleted posts just to make you look bad here on DP. That was your accusation right?

 

i have heared that thery do , some as old as moses.
what do you think the right of return is about?

 

How many people are alive from 1945 in order to "return" to their old homesteads?

Did Germany ever give the Jews a right to return to their property?

 

Are you comparing Israel to Nazi Germany? If so, that is very unfortunate. The sufferers of injustice have now become tormentors, and just like they were driven from their homes in Europe, tortured and killed, likewise they're doing the same to Palestinians.

Pathetic!

 

Dude, your reading comprehension leaves a lot to be desired.

As to your whole thread, are you actually so naive that you thought WikiPedia was an unbiased source of information? I thought most webmasters over the age of 15 would know since it's edited by people it contains bias.

 

Hm .. I'm with ohad .

 

a lot and their children. enough that israel objects to the right of return.
in any case i think a compromise can be achived
there would be a large amount of buildings constructed in the west bank and gaza. the refugees can be given these apartments instead of their claim in israel.i am not saying this will satisfy every one but it sure would be a big improvment and a majority of palestanians might agree to this if the buildings start to go up. using the palestanians to build these buildings would provide jobs and other insentives for them to be satisfied. i think the biggest obsticle for peace is lack of vision on part of both side.

 

Who wants a Bantustan named Palestine? Palestinians DON'T want Palestine. They just want the world to give them equal rights, treat them as human beings, not just colletral damage...

Palestinians would never accept anything less than full sovereignty. They don't need a Palestine for it. A place in Greater Israel, where they have equal rights with Israeli citizens, in a democratic republic, where the rights of all citizens are guaranteed, would be just fine...

Lets Roll... ---------------------The One-State Solution

 

Out of almost 1000 Palestinian kids you have murdered how many of the had a gun? I'm curious to hear that.

 

Its called squatters rights... j/k.

 

Does anyone feel like the Zionist plan to overthrow WikiPedia has been clearly proven in this thread? Anyone?

 

Nope, certainly not.

 

Wikipedia, Ziopedia or Judeopedia?
​

This is an article written by Mr Robert Lindsay, written in April 2006, but recently updated in February 2008. He has highlighted how he faced extreme opposition and threats of ban when he tried to edit Wiki entries related to Israel-Palestine conflict. Now, Robert is in no way biased towards either side, but he was harassed to extreme levels when he tried to correct certain Wiki entries on Israel-Palestine conflict. It shows the sysem has already been gamed.

The article is long and interesting, and Mr. Robert cites various experiences and clashes with some hard-core zionists, and how Wikipedia is being censored by certain groups who do not want the true nature of occupation of Palestine to come out.

You can no longer cite political info from Wikipedia, since it would most likely be already biased and tainted.

 

Someone should tell him that smoking weed and reading the koran can cause massive paranoia.

 

It is so surprising he was banned from editing Wiki. You call him unbiased, but his own words show his obvious bias.