Ypn Is best Or Adsense is Best Or ANy other?

Discussion in 'Publisher Network' started by surekhaweb, Oct 6, 2006.

  1. wentworth

    wentworth Guest

    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    If you like seeing your channel data quickly YPN is not the best.

    Adsense is near live and YPN's Tuesday reports at 6.12am have not yet been posted. That is more than a 30 hours delay.
     
    wentworth, Oct 11, 2006 IP
  2. trytobecool

    trytobecool Peon

    Messages:
    384
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    I don't care if i see my report after 1 day even. only thing i care is I am making more $ from it. Simple, Yahoo pays me more....



    sir, i think Yahoo publisher is better then adsense.:rolleyes:
     
    trytobecool, Oct 11, 2006 IP
  3. IamNed

    IamNed Peon

    Messages:
    2,707
    Likes Received:
    276
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    Anything beats adsense's 2-7 cent clicks
     
    IamNed, Oct 11, 2006 IP
  4. wentworth

    wentworth Guest

    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    YPN only has 100 channels so if you have a few websites you can't use YPN only unless you don't use channels. You have to use something else also.
     
    wentworth, Oct 11, 2006 IP
  5. maya786

    maya786 Peon

    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    YPN is better in 90% cases and adsense is on good with 10% cases

    So Shift to YPN
     
    maya786, Oct 11, 2006 IP
  6. iBold

    iBold Peon

    Messages:
    1,055
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    Compelling argument :)

    In any event. The story goes like this (from my experience, of course) -
    YPN (if you believe the hype) pays more per click in most cases. They also are not as good at G at serving up relevant ads, meaning a lower CTR.
    So - HIGHER pay per click, LOWER number of clicks

    G pays less per click in most cases. They are also far superior to YPN at displaying well targetted ads, meaning a higher CTR.
    So - LOWER pay per click, HIGHER number of clicks

    It really depends on your sites content. Can you fit into one of YPN's pre-defined site categories so the ads make sense to your visitors? Or better yet - do the YPN ads that you've tested on your site seem relevant? If so I would choose YPN.
    Otherwise, go the G route and get the extra clicks that might pay a little less per click.
     
    iBold, Oct 12, 2006 IP
  7. surekhaweb

    surekhaweb Banned

    Messages:
    504
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    Great Response For All Member
    Thanks You
     
    surekhaweb, Oct 15, 2006 IP
  8. footodors

    footodors Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    105
    #28
    I went from 20$ - 30$ per day on one site by switching from Yahoo to Adsense.
    The lower pay per click was far outweighed by the higher ctr on adsense.
    It's a site with many home improvement articles. At least in this niche, adsense is better for me.
     
    footodors, Oct 15, 2006 IP
  9. runnerunner

    runnerunner Active Member

    Messages:
    1,027
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #29
    I agree YPN is better than adsense in a lot of cases. If you've got the right niche Azoogleads or Commission Junction may be best however. They bring you one step closer to working directly with the advertisers so you'll get less middlemen and more money, only if you've got a narrow enough niche though.
     
    runnerunner, Oct 15, 2006 IP
  10. lui2603

    lui2603 Peon

    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    23
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    personally I think adsense is better :D
     
    lui2603, Oct 16, 2006 IP