Chicks are hot but I think I already told you what you should do... maybe in another forum? Combine all CSS into one file, minify it. Combine all JS (inline, external) into one file, minify it, load it before </body> !!! Site is loading 1.48MByte to my hdd... too much tbh. Google Page Speed Score is ONLY 67... bad. Suggestions from Google: Combine external JavaScript Enable compression Leverage browser caching Parallelize downloads across hostnames Serve static content from a cookieless domain Specify image dimensions Combine external CSS Minify CSS Minify JavaScript Serve scaled images Specify a Vary: Accept-Encoding header Avoid bad requests Optimize images Optimize the order of styles and scripts Code (markup): Scaling images in CSS from e.g. 800x600 to 240x160 pixels is very bad and slows down the site a lot! E.g. * http://www.babeslingeries.com/images/T/L_2008101217494170313.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 314x356 to 146x166. Serving a scaled image could save 49.5KiB (78% reduction). * http://www.babeslingeries.com/images/T/L_20098111442522474.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 380x432 to 146x166. Serving a scaled image could save 38.9KiB (85% reduction). * http://www.babeslingeries.com/images/T/L_2009811144764868.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 316x432 to 121x166. Serving a scaled image could save 23.5KiB (85% reduction). * http://www.babeslingeries.com/images/T/L_20107171641414555.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 319x431 to 123x166. Serving a scaled image could save 20.8KiB (85% reduction). * http://www.babeslingeries.com/images/T/L_2009810104521237.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 383x450 to 141x166. Serving a scaled image could save 19.5KiB (86% reduction). * http://www.babeslingeries.com/images/T/L_20097301511542506.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 262x432 to 101x166. Serving a scaled image could save 17.1KiB (85% reduction). * http://www.babeslingeries.com/images/T/L_200997162444740.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 280x493 to 94x166. Serving a scaled image could save 14.6KiB (88% reduction). * http://www.babeslingeries.com/images/T/L_20093241525170818.jpg is resized in HTML or CSS from 267x320 to 139x166. Serving a scaled image could save 13.6KiB (72% reduction). Code (markup): This is not the way to set up a biz site... my opinion. Get everything correct and surpise your visitors with a site that is loading blazin' fast. The better search engine results you will get !!! Design is ok, hot babes (you need to have them, ofcourse) but nothing special in design.