Your Opinion on Options In Afghanistan

debunked

I should start posting about terrorists and Muslims they have slowly been advancing, whilst you wrote all of that. Your placing us at grave risk

Mia speak place the quote FFS, I'm not qualified in mental health and disorders.

 

OK, if you say so OR is this just another strawman argument - like terrorists and muslims are some sort of race? I am betting its the latter.

Have no idea what that means.

 

Does it matter, they're coming? and you're wasting more time deciding if they are a race or not.

It means, I'M waiting for a quote....

 

They? Muslims are not a race. Sad boy. Did your parents raise you this way?

You might want to rephrase what you wrote in proper English, I doubt he understood you either.

 

They are a group, check the dictionary.

I doubt it, it's been written many times over and still no quote? maybe you should consider ending your civil partnership

I would be getting sore by now

 

Me either... And believe me, I have tried to understand it.

I already did.

Yeah, that might help. I have no idea what the hell he was asking.

Actually, it is you who should "check the dictionary". The dictionary actually lists Muslim as "of or pertaining to the religion, law, or civilization of Islam."

Or "one who submits" see also ISLAM.

Already did... Is that what you were trying ask me when you uttered that gibberish before?

 

You said something I posted was factually wrong, it is not difficult to spit it out as to exactly what and quote it and say what is factually wrong with it.

The problem you have is not that it's factually wrong, but rather you don't like what was said, that's why you dance around blowing hot air, acting confused and saying you have quoted the part and stated your point.

I don't doubt what your saying but you need to pay attention to what actually happened in this thread.

1. You babble on about wrong facts then refuse to post exactly what.
   
2. Debunked comes to your rescue by babbling on then trying to change the subject whilst posting nothing of substance in this thread.
   
3. It's pointed out to him that why he is sticking up for his civil partner "Muslims are terrorists" are advancing, so he may be better off posting hate and defending the nation.
   
4. Debunked then tries to get an admission that Muslims are a race, so he can say they are not then further divert the thread.
   
5. When he asked who "they" were he was told "they" are a group (of whatever) and may check the dictionary for guidance as I'm not interested.
   
6. Then you play stupid again.

Now lets wait for more babble.

 

Seems that's the difference between us. I like to play.

 

Seriously, putting up one strawman after another after we pointed out that is what you are doing is doing nothing for your argument, which, I have no idea what you are trying to argue in the first place because you keep changing the subject by putting up strawmen that you want to knock down, but if we don't give your strawmen the attention you want you put up the ultimate strawman.

 

You must be very good in playing the part, It is so convincing and I totally believe you.

 

Doesn't say much about you now does it

 

It is not my fault, you are so natural in that role. You are just playing yourself.

 

Seriously quit babbling...

 

Thanks for proving my point.

 

I don't even know why you post Debunk it's a waste of disk space, here's all your babbling content condensed to just one post,

Topic "Your Opinion on Options In Afghanistan" and we'll start with debunks post #1 an Ad-hominem, and then see if Debunk is indeed on topic or offering anything but babble.

Nope he won't mention the failed wars of Bush