Your Experience with Joe Ants

I use the paid submission, just like i do with every directory i submit to i cant be bothered waiting months to see if im accepted by taking the free route. Ive submitted to hundreds of paid directories and that includes joeant, the only free submissions i do is by paying members from dp to do so. Also i wouldnt become a volunteer as i cant see the point other then to get your own sites in which im fine paying for, but your obviously not. Hence moaning over joeants paid submission which youve never even used.

 

Good for you. your stories getting better. Who knows may be someone finally believe some of it.

 

Interesting turn of events. Apparently a link to adultad.com was there since it's now hidden in your source code. Who's hiding what? LMAO! I don't think you give the members here enough credit. I'm sure the intelligent ones can figure out what is going on here.

Oh, I'm sure you will remove that link completely now, so I took a screen shot just in case anyone wants to see it, though I doubt anyone will believe you when you say it isn't or was never there or even care if it's there or not. The only point I'm making is that you lied. I wonder why?

There was no personal attack made to the person who filed the rip-off report and it certainly was not a question but then I forgot that I'm responding to someone lacking in comprehension skills.

Obvious to whom, you? And you're an authority on joeant's business practices because ...? How many times do you have to be told that it isn't a submission fee?

You don't know their style since you've never used their review service. Why would anyone believe you?

 

You didn't know anything about joeant and barely volunteered in the beginning and all of a sudden you know everything about it and a big defender. I was thinking what was a big deal just asking about the review procedure but I suppose I can kind of guess what is happening. Why such a big mystery about volunteers and paid staff? My guess will be that some of you are getting paid while telling others that everybody is volunteers. If this is the cause and some of you are cheating the others then it is your own problem and got nothing to do with me or anyone else outside of your gang. The whole personal attack was a knee jerk reaction because you probably thought I am asking about the procedure and I know about the payments which was not the case.

For the rest of your BS, read my response to your boss:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1795191&postcount=96

 

First you say I know nothing about joeant then tell me to read what you wrote to my boss. Either I know nothing or I know a lot, which is it?

There wasn't any mystery. You were told repeatedly that a staff member did the paid reviews, which is on joeant's site. Volunteers do not get paid. What would be the point in denying you're a paid employee? And what does that have to do with joeant's customer service? I mean, you did say that you were trying to find out the procedures and if it was fair to joeant's customers, right?

What gang?

I didn't think you knew anything, which is why I offered the information that I found on their site. I did think you had an agenda but I didn't know what it was. It's more apparent now.

 

I meant your first posts when you were pretending to be a casual user of that directory but I know now that you are an employee or part owner. Any body can look at the history of your postings, interesting enough you only post in defense of the directory by making up different stories.

 

Dude, you really do have a wild imagination. If I were an employee or part owner of joeant, I'd have said so since it would have made anything I posted on this topic even more credible. The only reason there is any credibility in what I posted here is that the information came directly from their site or from a staff member who is in a position to know what joeant's policies are. That information can be found by anyone, even you.

My motivations for defending (your assessment, not mine) joeant or dmoz or any other directory that I have spent time editing for are my own and has nothing to do with any individual directory. I don't always agree with some of the directories policies or how they are managed but I believe they have an absolute right to manage their directories in whatever way they choose, baring anything illegal.

 

The guy complains about fair treatment even though he breaks the directories rules, then tries to lie about his link. Also thinks everyone who agrees with joeant is an employee, hah.

 

Are you referring to the whole 2 minutes that you have spent in that directory which included learning everything about their submission process and the information about who is volunteer and who is paid staff?

It gets even funnier that you have to attack other people and 13 of your 18 posts in this forum is in joeant defense. You sure spend a lot of time to protect your 2 minute investment in that directory.

 

That's just 3 answers stating basically the same thing. There wouldn't be 13 (now 14) post if you didn't continually ask the same questions or make things up and then present them as a fact. A good example is your inability to comprehend what I said in the last quote you felt a need to highlight.

It took a bit more than 2 minutes to submit a site but my responses to you was information taken from their site, which did take about 2 minutes to find.

Attack other people? Who did I attack, you?

All I did was discover you told a lie and pointed it out. Had you not said that the link to the adult site wasn't on the auto site, I would never have looked. I thought it was interesting that you spent a lot of time accusing joeant of hiding something when you have a hidden link on your site.

 

That site doesn't have a link as I mentioned, the link is commented in the source because all the classified use the same template. The reason that link is commented in that site is because it was using Yahoo advertising and according to their term could not have that link.

This discussion was never about me or that site, it was about joeant directory and a simple question about the submission procedure but it seems they are very shy about it.
You can make up as much as stories as you like but my last post showed how much you are really involved even if you only mention 2 minutes.

 

Your question was asked and answered multiple times.

Your last post only showed how creative your imagination is. It's your story, not mine. You're entitled to your imagined story but don't expect me to affirm it as anything but a made-up story.

This whole thread is a figment of your imagination and you, yourself proved that you had an agenda that went beyond the question of joeant's submission procedures. You continue to make false accusations, implications and assumptions based on your desire to find fault with joeant and anyone posting in favor of joeant. It's interesting that you're the only one who could not accept that your broken-record question was answered.

 

I bought a can RAID there is no more ANT issue...

 

has anyone contacted joeant off there site and got a reply?

thanks

 

Contact Luna, probably he can send you an answer, he seems to be the resident joeant employee and defender in this forum at present time.

 

LOL, you do stay in true form, gworld. Another misconception, I'm not a he.

 

I am glad that Joeant is equal opportunity employer but it does not change your relation to them.

 

Only in your mind. I am not employed by any online business of any kind, never have been.

 

Gworld, You've spent a lot of time here at DigitalPoint, but how many members here realize that Gworld is the abbreviation for http://www.gentlemenworld.com/ ? Why is it so hard for you to understand that family oriented directories do not accept sites like http://www.escorts-forum.com/, http://www.adultsfreehost.com/, and most importantly http://www.budget-drugstore.com/? I have stepped out of character here, but this is the first time my business practices/procedures have been questioned by an online pimp (that also happens to sell Viagra online - Classic! LOL). People who secretly backlink the above sites within' ordinary auto sites just to get listed in family oriented directories and signatures on message boards are not people I tend to take business advice from. If this came off as a personal attack again, I humbly apologize. The truth is going to hurt. Run and operate what ever company/website you want. Market it correctly and you won't have problems at DMOZ or JoeAnt.com. And when you get caught by the next directory, let people here know the true details before you try to defame them.




I'm Spent!

 

Like I mentioned previously, if you like to try personal attacks then at least read what your friends in DMOZ have done before, there is nothing in your post that has not been mentioned by DMOZ editors before. In regard to your family friendly directory, let's mention some of the websites with adult content (not links) that are listed in joeant directory.

buysell.com
bayareaclassified.com
friday-ad.co.uk
plugstar.com
join-friendfinder.com (entry page for adult friend frinder)

not to mention all other web sites with adult content and russian bride web sites.

I suppose if a link to adult web site makes some one a pimp then you should be the pimp of all pimps.