I wouldn't...Digg just banned like 1000 users even if they commented on them (Didn't even participate) Anyway, maybe you will get a few PMs from people who have ones running. I certainly don't think someone will be stupid enough to post a link to one.
There´s been a recent issue by the digg community about this matter. They are banning people for getting diggs in this way. Not going to work imo. Just submit a great story to digg and you´ll make it to the front page anyway.
Some great stories get buried though, while others posting the same stories lateron, but with a "boost", wind up on the front page.
Yeah, what I recently looked digg.com, there's coming incredible amount of new stories. I'm not sure what's logic for some story to be "great", there's something fishy going on... too. I guess there's quite a lot this kind of 'digg me, digging you' rings, not just here.
I wouldn't be surprised if the digg regulars have their own little clique deciding who they want on the front page ...
Out of the 400,000 users about 60 determine what goes on the front page. Thats the club you want to join.
Starting this thread is a really bad idea, trust me. Anyway I’m sure there are plenty of people interested but like yfs1 said I doubt they will post here.
I think, they at digg.com are aware about a possibilty of such clubs to exist. And... I believe, they have ways to find those clubs. Statisticak analysis is a powerfull thing. __ kind regards, Al
Here http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?p=1089420 People that think these clubs are somehow cheating diggs "great" system probably don't have the slightest idea of how crooked it is, top 50 members pretty much determine what is on the frontpage, I believe someone had the stat on this and it was something like 95%+ stories that reach the frontpage are submited by top 50 members... It is no democracy, clubs like this will not help crap get to the frontpage because that is just impossible this just lets you have chance againts the weight digg puts on top users...
The purpose of Digg is to promote good stories. It's not an advertising medium for wannabe sites. gasmonso
Diggheads, dont you understand with out "wannabe" sites digg wouldn't be shit Who do you think is submiting most of the stories, webmasters of "wannabe sites", and believe it or not some of them work hard to impress the digg users, except for some reason digg users have become completely idiotic in this stupid battle againts self-promotion and have put a bad label on "wanabbe" webmasters... I swear the whole main section of digg that actually actively diggs and buries stories is made of a bunch of insecure people waiting to bury or prove someone wrong to appear as if they are smart infront of others, I absolutely hate the environment over there..."look at this loser"..."this is not tech"..."lame"..."i already knew that"... . . . "I'm smart ...right? " . . . Digg is shit now the users and now the management have completely forgot who made them what they are now
To be honest I only digg stories that I want to keep for latter inspection. I couldn’t give less if the story is good or not, after I read it I move on. Only stories “sites†that I know will come in handy latter get my digg. “all opera stories are exempt from this rule †Ok I'm off to digg now