Yahoo Directory Penalized?

Discussion in 'Yahoo' started by wussadotcom, Sep 20, 2008.

0
Page 2 of 2
  1. wussadotcom

    wussadotcom Banned

    Messages:
    1,168
    Likes Received:
    43
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    Why not? Google is so biased.;)
     
    wussadotcom, Oct 3, 2008 IP
  2. kidsnscience

    kidsnscience Banned

    Messages:
    411
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    yahoo dir is punish
     
    kidsnscience, Oct 4, 2008 IP
  3. nasindo

    nasindo Active Member

    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    #23
    it's PR8 ! 100 % :)
     
    nasindo, Oct 5, 2008 IP
  4. SEOBOT

    SEOBOT Banned

    Messages:
    794
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    Yeah Its Pr8 Google Didnt Penalize Yahoo
     
    SEOBOT, Oct 5, 2008 IP
  5. mgwalk

    mgwalk Peon

    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    i can't see you getting penalized for yahoo directory...
     
    mgwalk, Oct 5, 2008 IP
  6. kingofsanda

    kingofsanda Peon

    Messages:
    8,154
    Likes Received:
    218
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    I would be extremely surprised if the yahoo directory got penalized.
     
    kingofsanda, Oct 5, 2008 IP
  7. sweetfunny

    sweetfunny Banned

    Messages:
    5,743
    Likes Received:
    467
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    I don't care what PR it is but to only get 3 visitors from it for the $299 listing fee is disgusting.
     
    sweetfunny, Oct 5, 2008 IP
  8. EOS

    EOS Peon

    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    Its still pr8 but its funny that on one hand Google says paying for links is bad, but on the other says a link from the Yahoo dir is good. Whats really up that?
     
    EOS, Oct 8, 2008 IP
Page 2 of 2