Yahoo beats Google in Web Search Fulfillment

Discussion in 'Yahoo' started by gford, Oct 26, 2007.

  1. #1
    Full Story
     
    gford, Oct 26, 2007 IP
    arcguy likes this.
  2. AAZZ

    AAZZ Active Member

    Messages:
    1,612
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #2
    Hmm never really liked google that much but used it.
    Might try yahoo next time and see differences when Im out hunting for site buying.
     
    AAZZ, Oct 26, 2007 IP
  3. rcj662

    rcj662 Guest

    Messages:
    4,403
    Likes Received:
    97
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Yahoo has some good results for some terms. Google has been showing some bad results after last update for some terms and alot of people use yahoo now.

    Google still sends more traffic and you will always get more sales even though it is less percent wise to convert.
     
    rcj662, Oct 26, 2007 IP
  4. joey112

    joey112 Guest

    Messages:
    2,250
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Yeh rightly so. As i have said for a while google is being manipulated by smart SEO experts. My site on cricket which has 50 pages of unique info. Is being outranked by a site with 4 lines of text on cricket. Go figure? Why would a visitor searching in cricket want 4 lines over 50 pages? they don't. It not accurate google. I have to go with yahoo for this.
     
    joey112, Oct 26, 2007 IP
  5. sandrodz

    sandrodz Peon

    Messages:
    1,482
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    but as volume of queries on google is more, google's 65% is more then yahoos 75%
     
    sandrodz, Oct 26, 2007 IP
  6. Zibblu

    Zibblu Guest

    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    98
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Google's search results are getting worse and worse in my opinion. They are playing too many games with webmasters and not doing their job. Their job is to give the best, most relevant search results.

    For example when they don't put JohnChow.com up as #1 for a search for "John Chow" that is BS. JohnChow.com is the most relevant site for "John Chow" and showing anything else is a failure by Google.
     
    Zibblu, Oct 26, 2007 IP
  7. joey112

    joey112 Guest

    Messages:
    2,250
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    totally agree. the whole system is flawed and manipulated.
     
    joey112, Oct 26, 2007 IP
  8. QB Marketing

    QB Marketing Guest

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Google's ability to provide good relevant SERPS is what has made it the powerhouse it is today. Can you really blame them for "punishing" someone for doing something they disagree with? They have to maintain their integrity or they will lose their value. Do I agree with everything Goggle has to say- no, but I do believe they have the right to ban sites for practices they believe are deceptive or unethical. If it ends up hurting their market share, they will likely change their minds and their practices.
     
    QB Marketing, Oct 26, 2007 IP
  9. Zibblu

    Zibblu Guest

    Messages:
    3,770
    Likes Received:
    98
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    If "punishing" webmasters gives less relevant search results (such as is obvious with the John Chow case) then this very "punishment" is hurting the relevancy of their SERPS. I don't see how this is maintaining any integrity. All they should be worrying about is the quality of their search results.

    I've seen a lot of really really really bad results for some adult/sex enhancement searches and I get the feeling that they are going around trying to "punish" all of the adult sites and thus they are ending up with very irrelevant results for these searches. This kind of playing God is getting real old. Just give us the best results! Forget all of the other garbage.
     
    Zibblu, Oct 27, 2007 IP
  10. Sam Asante

    Sam Asante Peon

    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    I always use google.
    As does everybody I know.
     
    Sam Asante, Oct 27, 2007 IP
  11. wisdomtool

    wisdomtool Moderator Staff

    Messages:
    15,825
    Likes Received:
    1,367
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    455
    #11
    Google wins at areas where it matters most, get money into their pockets with some spare change for those in the adsense program :)
     
    wisdomtool, Oct 27, 2007 IP
  12. Nosfer

    Nosfer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,799
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #12
    well i've started using Yahoo a couple of months ago because i use their mailing system a lot, and i was pretty pleased with their search fulfillments so from then... i've used Yahoo a lot.
     
    Nosfer, Oct 27, 2007 IP
  13. SlickR

    SlickR Active Member

    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    90
    #13
    Agreed. smart onsite and offsite SEO and a 5 lines of text site would win over 500 lines of text site.
    5 pages site would win over 50 pages site.
    long time not updated site would win over frequently updated site.

    So yeah i'm also with yahoo on this one.
    Google is loosing its core and that is to show quality and very realted search results.
    I partially mention this in my post about google really relying too much on its pagerank to show results and thus bigger pagerank sites will always win over smaller pr sites even if the smaller site has a lot more in quality, quantity and updated content.
    Check out my thread:
    http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=512823
     
    SlickR, Oct 27, 2007 IP
  14. Lordy

    Lordy Peon

    Messages:
    1,643
    Likes Received:
    29
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    66 x 2/3rd is more than yahoos x 75 :p
     
    Lordy, Oct 27, 2007 IP
  15. gford

    gford Peon

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    33
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    So what?

    I think the point is as more and more people become dissatisfied with results in any search engine they will try another. Customer loyalty will only last as long as the last group of successful searches.

    Fail to find what you are searching for you can (a) modify your search or (b) try the search that failed on a different SE.

    Assuming anyone tries (b), Yahoo retention would increase. I still prefer Google but I must admit I am seeing more and more problems with it. But I also see problems with Yahoo.

    This study just shows that the gap between search engines search result fulfillment will continue to shrink unless there is a dramatic new algorithm finding.
     
    gford, Oct 28, 2007 IP