hey just a question, how many of you guys actually started adopting the recent xhtml 2.0 standards? right now i I guess xhtml transitional 1.0 is more or less common, but i think we'll adopt xhtml 2.0 sooner or later, so why not now? btw incase you wanna know, I think the image tag for xhtml 2.0 is now <img src=" ">your alt text </img>
I thought the W3C was originally trying to push forward the use of the <object> image tag but IE doesn't support it, they must have changed their minds. I've always tried following all of the standards available to me, I try to make my website work in as many different standards as possible, but I mainly concentrate on XHTML 1.0 Strict. I think XHTML2 is still pretty far away since not all of the browsers (mainly IE) like XHTML2.
Microsoft does not support XHTML at all and has no plans to do so. Plus, I doubt the OP is serving XHTML as xhtml so it does little to no good. I'll never understand why anyone is using the transitional doctype for new web pages, too. Makes no sense at all.
I mostly agree, Doc. There are times, though. I've been forced to go the transitional route because of IE's really crappy rendering of imported web pages using the object element, leaving the iframe as the only reasonable way to go. cheers, gary