There has been some debate on whether sitewide or single page links are better for you SEO wise... So...it leads me to ask this question... would you rather pay $5 per link on a link that shows on a single page, or $10-$15 per link on a sitewide link (both would be on a forum)... (this is a hypothetical question...so i won't make up any stats...just think something you'd pay that price for...then decide which you'd rather have...and boom...that's the site i'm talking about )
I rather to have a link on sitewide instead of one site because we can increase the number of backlink like this.
I'm forming the impression that Google is penalising sitewides to sites and that single page to sub-page links are the way to go -- no real evidence as yet just a sneaking suspicion!