Would this be useful? Alternate content source

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by Regrouping-webmaster, Mar 1, 2015.

0
  1. #1
    If there was a WordPress plugin that added twitter/ebay content (50-300 words) containing sensible densities of (specified) keywords, would you use it? Would you buy it?

    Obviously the theoretical plugin would have to comply with all relevant terms of service, copy write law (cite sources, etc), and Google webmaster guidelines (seo "rules"). I'm really thinking it's value would be for low content posts like image/video posts and be primarily automated.

    I'm seriously thinking about writing this. Would this be useful to you? What features/functionality would you want in it? Assuming I write this, do you want to be notified when I finish it?
     
    Regrouping-webmaster, Mar 1, 2015 IP
  2. blogdum

    blogdum Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    538
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    #2
    I would like to test it as long as the plugin provides unique content.
     
    blogdum, Mar 1, 2015 IP
  3. deepakrajput

    deepakrajput Member

    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    #3
    These SEO tools provides auto-generated content, that are not much effective. Manually written content is Best.
     
    deepakrajput, Mar 3, 2015 IP
  4. patco

    patco Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,035
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    100
    #4
    Would look good if it can REALLY write UNIQUE content.. Which won't happen for images.. For text it would be just like a normal rewriter or spinner.. What exactly is your idea? :)
     
    patco, Mar 3, 2015 IP
  5. Regrouping-webmaster

    Regrouping-webmaster Active Member

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #5
    A utility that pulls text from a series of 3rd party sources, citing them intelligently, but "scrambled" so they look like unique content. EX. 20 (unrelated) tweets containing the keywords, 5 e-bay items (images + titles), random fluff. I'm a bit concerned that if EVERY tweet and sentence contained they keywords it would be a problem, but that's an easy thing to fix.

    The are different levels to do this. From 1-3 keyword references and <50 words to nearly the entire content of the page. At a minimum I can get sensible keyword densities and pass unique content checks. I used to use a (spammy) tool (BANS) that used to rank successfully using 100% auto-generated content in a similar way.
     
    Regrouping-webmaster, Mar 3, 2015 IP