Would this be seen as cloaking?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by sim64, Jun 10, 2008.

  1. #1
    If you have a look at this page,

    http://www.uksmallbusinessdirectory.co.uk/uk-accountants-2.asp

    you will see it has about 250 listings on it, and once it is indexed that is what
    google will see.

    Very few people will go direct to the page though, they will land on there
    after using a search box similar to the one on the top of the page and by
    doing this the page will return different content.

    Would this be classed as cloaking, and would google see it as a bad thing?
    TIA.
     
    sim64, Jun 10, 2008 IP
  2. astup1didiot

    astup1didiot Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,926
    Likes Received:
    270
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    280
    #2
    I think someone needs to understand what cloaking is....

    Cloaking: Cloaking is a method by which specific content is served up to the search engine spider that is different then what the normal searcher sees.
     
    astup1didiot, Jun 10, 2008 IP
  3. sim64

    sim64 Active Member

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    98
    #3
    The content the search enines see is all 250 listings, the content the normal
    searcher sees is just the content from the area they have searched for
    (which might only be 1 listing)

    It isn't a deliberate ploy to fool search engines, but the content an engine
    sees will be completely different from the content a user sees.
    anything to worry about?
     
    sim64, Jun 10, 2008 IP
  4. seofanatic

    seofanatic Active Member

    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #4
    No, that's not cloaking. You are serving up some dynamic content based on the user's search, correct? If the user was to go the absolute URL you provided, the content is going to be the same for them as the SE's will see when they spider the page.
     
    seofanatic, Jun 10, 2008 IP