Hi guys, I'm a golf and tennis fan and I'm just wondering who everyone thinks is the better athlete - Tiger Woods or Roger Federer?
I agree, you have to define in what terms. Agility wise you could argue Fed, but Woods is pretty active like that himself.
Well, I like Woods, but I like Federer too so there's only one thing for it ... FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT! Who do you think would win???
Both are the top players in respective sports. Tiger Woods is No.1 in Golf, and he is maintaining his No.1 since long time where as in tennis federer is No.1 but some times he loose matches against nadal. In tennis it is little bit difficult to maintain No.1 why because, in every tournament new players use to participate. So their they high competition. Any way both are No.1's in their Sports. we cant say best one.
Both player are legend in their formate of sport, One is the best in Golf and Second one is the best in Tennis...
It starts with your definition of an athlete. Do you mean pure physical prowess or a combination physical and mental. Tennis is a more physical sport, running around a court all day and really hard on your knees. If old men can play it well, is it really a sport (meaning golf)
For simple reason i would say Woods because in Tennis Yes Roger is great player but he does not have great opposition players in tennis except 2 or 3 , always wins the grand slams pretty easily with a weak set of players in tennis.
I feel that it is a tougher challange to get this sort of consistency in Golf where luck is a major factor. The wind, the course, the grass, the bounce, there are so many factors in Golf.
dont know? but do question whether as good as tiger woods is whether he deserves to be first pro sportsman to earn 1 billion dollars or be paid 3 million AUS just to appear at a golf tournament in australia???