Womens Rights -- Are they for all women or just some women?

Sin is sin in every religion.But who cares ?

 

Repeat of previous post:

Gtech

Let's make a deal. You make a post that shows one problem in Christianity and Bush policies then I make a post that shows one problem in Islam and terrorist actions. We can continue from there and post in turn.

Will you agree to this? It should not be any problem for you unless you believe that Christianity and Bush administration are free from all faults.

 

I don't negotiate with terrorists or those that support, defend and make excuses for them. By all means, continue posting what gives you the most pleasure

 

What is the exact purpose of starting this thread ?
Blaming muslims or islam ? their cultures or will to run with media ?

 

e10:

No one is saying that every Muslim is bad.

What is being said is:

1.Some Muslims are bad.
2. This is not in contradiction with the teachings of the Koran.

In other words, you have made a straw-man argument. Or, you have simply followed blindly in gworld's straw-man argument.

debunked and G-Tech are making rational fact-driven arguments, and you are characterizing them unfairly.

 

Must it be the "exact purpose?" I always love that one!

No fear, Nokia, gworld is here for you

 

Does this mean that you can not even find one fault with Christianity or Bush policies?

I think this is a perfect example of how close minded you are, blame every one else but see no fault in your own actions. this is specially funny when even Bush has started to admit to his own mistakes now. I suppose the old habit of ignoring every mistake which was the government policy in the last few years dies hard.

 

I don't think that the Bush administration is doing enough to spread civilization across the globe. I think that we should immediately bomb Iran's nuclear infrastructure.

Your turn.

 

I told gtech to put up or shut up, Will. As you can see, he is unable to do either. What's to understand here? (Or do you see some kind of "hidden proof" in gtech's message?) His witty retort doesn't provoke a lot of thought.

I think you have some valid points, when you're not bashing someone for the sake of bashing them.

 

ccole1968:

G-Tech has made an excellent case to support his position.

I am not surprised that you deny all evidence which is not in support of your unsupportable position.

I had not really expected otherwise.

 

One of my favorites! There must be blame somewhere, so you must admit. I must see the admission with my own eyes. I will pretend to be genuinely concerned and then down the road, every other post, will use your own words against you in every way possible for the rest of my term on the forum.

Gworld, please. Do you not think people see these same, tired old tactics?

 

According to your previous posting, only people who have read the Koran in Arabic can have opinion about Koran, have you read the koran in Arabic, or is this another case of my wife is Arab and she said so and everyone here must accept this?

 

Well, obviously some people care.

They care enough to punish women for the sins of their brothers by sentencing them to be gang raped.

They care enough to execute their daughters for the sin of marrying for love.

They care enough to execute women for the sin of accusing a man of raping her.

They care enough to cut peoples heads off for the sin of being Jewish.

They care enough to roll wheelchair-bound old men off the sides of cruise ships for the sins of being Jewish.

Get the idea? People do care about these things -- even if you don't.

 

Should I stand in the corner too? I've been a bad, bad infidel! Please don't bite my head off?

 

Are you admitting that you can not even find one fault / mistake in 2000 years history of Christianity or 5 years of Bush administration?

 

I don't think they bite 'em off anymore. I think they cut 'em off with big kitchen knives.

But hey, look at the bright side -- you get to be on TV.

 

gtech likes to point to his "rap sheet" whenever anyone has something to say which places muslims and christians on a level moral playing field. I would say that is an act of unfair characterization.

I don't know about you, Will, but most of the muslims I have met, would be sickened by gtech's favourite website and want no part of it. It's irresponsible of him to mislead people like that.

 

With the same logic, other people can ask you not to drop napalm bombs that not only kills them but also kills their wife, children, uncle, aunt, neighbors and people who had nothing to do with this thread in other forums.

 

If I murdered a lot of innocent people and G-Tech listed them all on a website, I might be pretty unhappy with the website too.

Does that somehow make G-Tech bad for listing my crimes?

Does that somehow make me innocent of those crimes?

So it's OK to rape and murder people, but it's not OK to talk about it?

 

Please help then, by pointing out what was misleading? I seriously am wondering what is being lied about on the site? I don't care to read very much of it, since it turns my stomach.