With all the talk of images, I wonder if this style would violate Google's TOS

Discussion in 'AdSense' started by maryn, Dec 20, 2006.

0
  1. #1
    [​IMG]

    :D
    It's their image, it's their text ads.
     
    maryn, Dec 20, 2006 IP
  2. seobeglobal

    seobeglobal Banned

    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Hahahaha, very clever, I guess it doesn't violate Google TOS. But I guess the upper ad won't always show images in certain pages.
     
    seobeglobal, Dec 20, 2006 IP
  3. ian_batten

    ian_batten Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    106
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #3
    Great find! I am sure they will be facing a banning before long :D
     
    ian_batten, Dec 20, 2006 IP
  4. mani

    mani Peon

    Messages:
    679
    Likes Received:
    16
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    clever :)
    but it will not give much benefit that small thumbnail can give, But those are now against TOS, but this type of placement is not against TOS :D
     
    mani, Dec 20, 2006 IP
  5. qwestcommunications

    qwestcommunications Notable Member

    Messages:
    8,868
    Likes Received:
    172
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    233
    #5
    I don't see anything wrong with that because thats their header. They have been clever at this.
     
    qwestcommunications, Dec 20, 2006 IP
  6. sketch

    sketch Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    898
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    148
    #6
    That is a good idea, but is it worth it to implement something like that if you're using one ad to get another clicked? Keep in mind you only get to use 3 ad units, these two are kind of combined into a pseudo-big ad :p

    Let me rephrase if it didn't make sense, lol ... would it be more effective to use two ads together like the sample above or leave them separate?
     
    sketch, Dec 20, 2006 IP