First you are insulting me and accusing me of all sort of stuff and now you have the nerve to say I am harrassing YOU. Once again: If someone would read that single post alone from you he/she would get the wrong idea of your meanings. Reading the whole thread is of non-importance regarding the point i am trying to explain to you. That's ALL! Mighty difficult to understand and acknowledge huh? Jeez.
Now you are beginning to understand how liberal press works. If you take words out of context without looking at the whole picture, it is easy to come to just about any conclusion. I'm not insulting you. I am just asking that you actually respect other members by reading the entire thread. If reading this thread is "of non-importance", why even participate in it? Now you are confusing me...
Exactly what I am thinking. As soon as they get a chance, they report something bad about Bush, without considering if there was any contradicting points to the story.
Exactly, that's why i pointed out to you to take more care wording your meanings! Once again this SINGLE post i refered to is exactly the cause for people taking things out of context. That's why i participated. You say you are not insulting me? You already did. Once again i tell you to choose your wordings more carefully, instead you could have better said ''i didn't mean to insult you'' since you already did by telling and portraing me as someone that is as usual trying to pick a fight. Your posts are not person to person type discussions and many more people will see for example your post about Norway being neutral in WII. One can percieve you saying that Norway is neutral in the whole period of WII in your post because not everyone is going to read the whole thread. Understand what i am trying to tell you? And yes... i didn't read the whole thread myself as well that's why i asked you about the matter and pointed out the possible confusion that may result from your post. Yeah Yeah, they should have read the whole thread then right? You're right but not everyone will. You have a hard time understanding my intentions where genuine and sincere and didn't hold any hostility towards you. But you're so confused so never mind... Forgetaboutit Man
Again, that is why you need to read the entire thread. That was not my intention. If it makes you feel better. I am really, really very sorry that I insulted you by stating historical fact and backing that historical fat up by citing reputable sources. Gee, I don't want to insult anyone, but when researching historical facts as to the neutrality of Norway during the WWI and WWII, you many be slightly insulted by the truth. If the truth insults you, I am eternally sorry, and will forever be apologetic for brining historical fact to light. And if they followed the links to the sources I cited, they will probably be insulted to learn I was correct. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence, even those starved for oxygen in their brains will likely seek to understand why such a statement was made. Given that the statement was an account of historical fact, backed by reputable sources, anyone finding indifference or insult in the post likely is beyond saving, on a psychological level. If I pick a single sentence or paragraph from just about any written conversation, be it on an internet forum, a book or magazine article, I am certain I could derive just about any meaning fathomable. You might want to read the entire thread. Which explains why you are confused. Those who want to enter into the discussion without inserting foot in mouth will likely seek to explore the entire thread first. Those who are lazy, will not. (my apologies for that insult) Your hostility comes from your unending need to show a complete and utter lack of respect by mincing words, and taking my posts entirely out of context. My only confusion is in understanding why you keep at this. Read the entire thread. Once you've done that, I would love to continue the diatribe.
OK, we have had enough... Edz and Mia, please take this to PM if it is to continue it is ruining the thread, like having to be in the room during an arguement. Thank you....
LOL - Mia ........... you will argue about anything .... Here I can prove it I am going to make a statement .. how much you wanna bet Mia will argue it! Here Goes: My Mother is a woman! now watch Mia create an arguement about it!
Thank you for bringing us back on topic - again. Don't worry debunked. I'm done repeathing myself. Anyway, did anyone happen to see this: "The decision of the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to lift a ban on Iranian women attending football matches has created new uncertainty in the country." from CNNhttp://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/05/01/iran.football/index.html Take a closer look at the entire article. It is quite interesting. Who can figure this guy out. On one hand he is a complete lunactic who strives to piss of the entire non-muslam world, and on the other hand he pisses off the muslam world (Shitites anyway) by letting women enter a sporting event. I still think that the regime will tumble of its own accord, and the great people (the youth) of Iran will make a positive change! PS - Mr Crow, so is mine.
He isn't a man for either the koran(that is actually pro-Israel) or the people of the wester society. All he wants is to kill the zionists(jews).
I'm not sure even he knows what he wants. He looks like that guy everyone used to pick on in high school... The one that got swirelys, and titty-twisters. Poor guy!