Will google consider this as cloaking?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by extreme911, Apr 1, 2009.

  1. #1
    Hello, my website - (www.plantingarden.com) have some randomly selected "Intros" (they will change with each page refresh) of the articles on its top part (on the main page only).

    The question - will google consider this as cloaking?
     
    extreme911, Apr 1, 2009 IP
  2. vansterdam

    vansterdam Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,145
    Likes Received:
    120
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    245
    #2
    This is not cloaking. Cloaking is to purposely provide different content for users and search engine spiders. There is no problem with rotating content....as far as penalties anyway. It might not be very good from an seo perspective though. Basically your website would be focusing on different keywords each time Google visits. Since it is the content at the top of the page, this could be a problem. It would probably be better if that section was in a div near the bottom of the code and set to display at an absolute position.
     
    vansterdam, Apr 1, 2009 IP
  3. extreme911

    extreme911 Peon

    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Yah, i will move this part to the bottom and will make it as "Latest Articles"... (not just random), so changes will occur not that often.


     
    extreme911, Apr 1, 2009 IP
  4. vansterdam

    vansterdam Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,145
    Likes Received:
    120
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    245
    #4
    Yes that will probably be better. You could still have a random list of articles somewhere, but maybe exclude the description so that not so much text is changing.
     
    vansterdam, Apr 1, 2009 IP
  5. nickjason

    nickjason Peon

    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    cloaking is black hat technique. but to make your article random is not being to consider cloaking by Google.
     
    nickjason, Apr 1, 2009 IP