I have a better idea. Let's make it illegal to spread information that would upset the natural sovereign laws that are already in place in the United States ? Maybe other countries as well. If a lawyer is reading this, I hope a light bulb went off.
You need to look at the defination of espionage in the 100 year old Espionage Act. Secondly, what are you smoking? He hasn't been charged for anything, anywhere and furthermore, even the accusations don't mention the word or the act of "rape". Its no wonder our in-home republican Obamanation has no answer to this.
Answer to why his extradition papers don't mention the word rape? What do I care? He is wanted in in Sweden to answer questions pertaining to sex related crimes. That is good enough for most countries that honor international law and extradition treaties. Having seen the testimony of those girls in print, he would be charged with rape in the US. Let him go face his accusers in Sweden. I'm confident the fair and just Swedish courts will find him innocent if he is truly innocent.
He wasn´t asking you about why rape is not mentioned in extradition order , he was asking why don´t you answer my question about why USA doesn't respect international law and sending back convicted criminals to serve their time in Italy.
I'm not familiar with the case you are referring to, but it obviously has nothing to do with Assange. You either think those women who claim Assange forced himself on them deserve to have their day in court, or you don't.
As such strong supporter of law and order why don´t you familiarize yourself with the case. The Americans are convicted to prison terms of 5 to 8 years for kidnapping and torture. What do you thinks is more serious crime, kidnapping and torture or having sex without condom? Are you seriously suggesting that an extradition order for questioning about a possible crime should be enforced but convicted criminals that have been sentenced by a court of law should not be extradited to server their prison term?
I don't recall weighing in on your case from Italy. Would have been difficult to weigh in without knowing anything about it. Perhaps, at some point, I'll look up the details of your Italian case and form an opinion about it. As I mentioned earlier, it has nothing to do with Assange being extradited for sexual assault, which I fully support and so should you.
If you continue, I have to spank you like the little bit*h that you are which makes you cry and run to moderators. I am not answering because I don´t want to give an excuse to your gang of cowards to report my posts.
Why am I not surprised 2 right wing Republicans Su*king each other di*k in a public forum? Because they can´t help it, they do it every where.
Then your only knowledge is the use of Extradition and have no knowledge of the more convenient way of Rendition, employed by the previous Administration where accusations from plaintiffs are conveniently made unnecessary and very well would have been used to send Assange to your preferred destination of Afghanistan for the purposes the CIA was passed judgment against in Italy. Interesting how both you and Bush are suffering the same case of selective amnesia and the CIA knows absolutely nothing about it.
Ya i was gonna say that if someone would report G-World you could report him for a lot of posts . Self-censorship doesn't change a thing .
Unlike you I do not have a profound affection for Clinton - the laws are what are important not the whims of politicians. At least there are a few Lloyd Cutlers to build on to give a sense of hope. I also do not hide behind cliché's as the word "Terrorist".
Judges in Sweden are elected by political parties, all whom had to suffer a LOT of embarrassment in their own country as a DIRECT result of wikileaks, further more Sweden has its head shoved deep into USA's ass.