and yet he have billions of believers, and that is your problem? I believe what I want to believe... it's my life, it's my mind and it's my faith, have any problem with that? do i have a RIGHT to believe what I want to believe? do you have a life?
First he comes in with lies about the Bible and Christianity and because I respond with something negative about islam you have a cow and think I hate the people? interesting to say the least. I don't hate you or the 300 million islamists. I do hate the evil in the world, do you have a problem with that? I don't agree with muhamads religion or many other religions for that matter. But why is it when someone confronts islam you and many others will start screaming hate or pulling a race card? If you can't take the heat back from what one dished out, then don't even read the threads. Did I say you can't believe what you want? Why do you think I have no life? Next you will probably be threatening my life or something as lame.
you said copy. witch one did he copy? well if you hate muhammad, than simple logic that also hate his followers. evil == muhammad or islam or muslim? if you don't agree with muhammad teaching, so great for you, don't be his followers. if i said something about jesus, mock his name, make joke on his name, how you feel? pitty, I'm a muslim and I can't do that. I respect christians, but I guess some christians don't respect muslim. so why can't you respect my believe? who threaten you? you always have a negative thinking about muslim.
Hello everyone just saw the topic and wanted to give a short answer. You say that MOHAMMAD is more important then JESUS , first of all its not true . And this question is in your mind just because if millions of believers . OK let me give you an short and meaning full answer why we do give lost importance to MOHAMMAD because before MOHAMMAD (SAllalahu alihe wasalam ) any Messenger for a particular time and for a particular Country / village / area where our MOHAMMAD ( Peace be upon him ) was sent as a guid for all the humans living on the world and for this ALLAH Wrote book QURAN which is still in its state . Anyway my brothers the only thing that make me disappointed from your people is that you dont give any kind of respect to any other religion , while in ISLAM it teach us to give respect to all religion but do follow ISLAM . So brothers hope my answer will work for you if didnt you can ask me more i will do my best to provide clear answer to remove your this question .
to bad that the my religion is for me, your religion is yours only works in islam. they have no respect in islam, but still we respect them.
Yup, plenty of respect from islam lots of examples of respect towards Christians, Jews and other religions documented. kitman by chance?
well i don't search much for islam website, but i found this web site a good one. specially this page
The Bible itself has admitted that the Bible is corrupted into a lie by the writers of the Bible themselves: We all know that the entire Bible is corrupted and unreliable and is mostly filled with man-made laws and corruption! "`How can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)" The Revised Standard Version makes it even clearer: "How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie. (From the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)" In either translation, we clearly see that the writers of the Bible had so much corrupted the Bible with their man-made cultural laws, that they had turned the Bible into a lie! The present Bible is a lie for it contains so many errors, contradictions etc and we find that the different versions of the Bible contradict one another so the present Bible is not the Word of Allah (God) because Allah did not and does not contradict His own Word because Allah is the All-Wise and All-Knowing! Here are some examples of the contradictions of the Bible and its versions: Acts 3:26 Peter's second sermon: NASB: "For you first, God raised up His Servant and sent Him to bless you by turning every one of you from your wicked ways." (NASB ©1995) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GWT: God has brought his servant back to life and has sent him to you first. God did this to bless you by turning every one of you from your evil ways." (GOD'S WORD®) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KJV: Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities. Acts 3:13: NASB: "The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified His servant Jesus, the one whom you delivered and disowned in the presence of Pilate, when he had decided to release Him. (NASB ©1995) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GWT: The God of our ancestors Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob has glorified his servant Jesus. You handed Jesus over to Pilate. You rejected him in Pilate's presence, even though Pilate had decided to let him go free. (GOD'S WORD®) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KJV: The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son Jesus; whom ye delivered up, and denied him in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let him go. Comment: This contradiction shows how the writers of the Bible have illegally altered the Biblical verses by replacing the word ' His Servant ' with ' his Son Jesus ' !!! The highlighted words above prove that the writers of the Bible have corrupted the Bible into a lie by replacing the word ' His servant Jesus' with ' his son Jesus ' to trick Christians into believing that Jesus is the son of God and accepting the false doctrine The Trinity that rejects the Oneness of God.
Again with the confusion..... the one thing the site you are getting this from does not even try to understand is these are not contradictions at all. black would be a contradiction to white - good to bad - Jesus to mahamad - those are contradictions. All you are pointing out is the differences of interpretation from the original language into English and different time periods of our ever changing language (English), but I know you don't want to hear that because you are trying to find something false. Like Forrest Gump always says "stupid is what stupid does..." You should think of the excuse of why you don't want your precious koran put into English = we already have 3 different versions of the English koran which one isn't corrupt?
Who said that we adore Mohamad pbuh than Jesus pbuh, we muslims love and respect all prophets as we love Mohamad pbuh. Christians accepts Jesus pbuh on the account of the prophesies in the Old Testimon, but we Muslims accpets Jesus as the Mesiah on jus one wrd of Mohamad pbuh. And not jus Jesus pbuh we love and respect all the prophets of God, coz we are being taught by God to love and respect all the Prophets and dont make any diffrence amng thm. You say why Mohamad pbuh was not born of a virgin, it was God will on the day of judgement you can ask this question to God.. & if you think that Jesus pbuh is more greater tham Mohamad jus he was not having natural Father than according to you Adam pbuh was even more greater than Jesus pbuh coz he didnt have father and mother both. Allah himself gives the answer for you in Quran, when Allah wants to decree a matter he jus says BE and IT IS, for Allah to make 100 jesus is jus a snap of a finger coz Allah is the most power full. And you say Jesus pbuh name arises more time than Mohamad pbuh itself. It is becoz there were allegation against Jesus pbuh and the time when Quran was reveled he was not present there, this way Jesus pbuh name comes 25 times and MOses pbuh name come s 132 times, becoz in this context God was comunicating with Mohamad pbuh, there was no need to address him every time with his own name.
Who said that we adore Mohamad pbuh than Jesus pbuh, we muslims love and respect all prophets as we love Mohamad pbuh. Christians accepts Jesus pbuh on the account of the prophesies in the Old Testimon, but we Muslims accpets Jesus as the Mesiah on jus one wrd of Mohamad pbuh. And not jus Jesus pbuh we love and respect all the prophets of God, coz we are being taught by God to love and respect all the Prophets and dont make any diffrence amng thm. You say why Mohamad pbuh was not born of a virgin, it was God will on the day of judgement you can ask this question to God.. & if you think that Jesus pbuh is more greater tham Mohamad jus he was not having natural Father than according to you Adam pbuh was even more greater than Jesus pbuh coz he didnt have father and mother both. Allah himself gives the answer for you in Quran, when Allah wants to decree a matter he jus says BE and IT IS, for Allah to make 100 jesus is jus a snap of a finger coz Allah is the most power full. And you say Jesus pbuh name arises more time than Mohamad pbuh itself. It is becoz there were allegation against Jesus pbuh and the time when Quran was reveled he was not present there, this way Jesus pbuh name comes 25 times and MOses pbuh name come s 132 times, becoz in this context God was comunicating with Mohamad pbuh, there was no need to address him every time with his own name.
Quran also says Adam pbuh was born without Mother and Fahter , do you mean he is greater than Jesus pbuh. No, for God to create Adam pbuh without Mother and Father , jus like that a snap of finger, for God to create Jesus pbuh without Father jus like that snap of finger. You say why Mohamad pbuh was not born to a virgin , only Allah will answerthis question , so on the day of judgement we can ask Allah abt this. Insha Allah this would answer all your questions Is it not true that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has copied the Qur’an from the Bible? Answer Many critics allege that Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) himself was not the author of the Qur’an but he learnt it and/or plagiarised (copied or adapted) it from other human sources or from previous scriptures or revelations. 1. MUHUMMAD LEARNT THE QUR’AN FROM A ROMAN BLACKSMITH WHO WAS A CHRISTIAN Some Pagans accused the Prophet of learning the Qur’an from a Roman Blacksmith, who was a Christian staying at the outskirts of Makkah. The Prophet very often used to go and watch him do his work. A revelation of the Qur’an was sufficient to dismiss this charge - the Qur’an says in Surah An-Nahl chapter 16 verse 103: "We know indeed that they say, ‘It is a man that teaches him,’ The tongue of him they wickedly point to is notably foreign, while this is Arabic, pure and clear." [Al-Qur’an 16:103] How could a person whose mother tongue was foreign and could hardly speak little but of poor broken Arabic be the source of the Qur’an which is pure, eloquent, fine Arabic? To believe that the blacksmith taught the Prophet the Qur’an is some what similar to believing that a Chinese immigrant to England, who did not know proper English, taught Shakespeare. 2. MUHUMMAD (PBUH) LEARNT FROM WARAQA - THE RELATIVE OF KHADIJAH (RA) Muhummad’s (pbuh) contacts with the Jewish and Christian Scholars were very limited. The most prominent Christian known to him was an old blind man called Waraqa ibn-Naufal who was a relative of the Prophet’s first wife Khadijah (r.a.). Although of Arab descent, he was a convert to Christianity and was very well versed with the New Testament. The Prophet only met him twice, first when Waraqa was worshipping at the Kaaba (before the Prophetic Mission) and he kissed the Prophet’s forehead affectionately; the second occasion was when the Prophet went to meet Waraqa after receiving the first revelation. Waraqa died three years later and the revelation continued for about 23 years. It is ridiculous to assume that Waraqa was the source of the contents of the Qur’an. 3. PROPHET’S RELIGIOUS DISCUSSIONS WITH THE JEWS AND CHRISTIANS It is true that the Prophet did have religious discussions with the Jews and Christians but they took place in Madinah more than 13 years after the revelation of the Qur’an had started. The allegation that these Jews and Christians were the source is perverse, since in these discussions Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was performing the roles of a teacher and of a preacher while inviting them to embrace Islam and pointing out that they had deviated from their true teachings of Monotheism. Several of these Jews and Christians later embraced Islam. 4. THE PROPHET LEARNT THE QUR’AN FROM THOSE JEWS AND CHRISTIANS THAT HE MET OUTSIDE ARABIA All historical records available show that Muhummad (pbuh) had made only three trips outside Makkah before his Prophethood: At the age of 9 he accompanied his mother to Madinah. Between the age of 9 and 12, he accompanied his uncle Abu-Talib on a business trip to Syria. At the age of 25 he led Khadija’s Caravan to Syria. It is highly imaginary to assume that the Qur’an resulted from the occasional chats and meetings with the Christians or Jews from any of the above three trips. 5. LOGICAL GROUNDS TO PROVE THAT THE PROPHET DID NOT LEARN THE QUR’AN FROM JEWS OR CHRISTIANS The day-to-day life of the Prophet was an open book for all to see. In fact a revelation came asking people to give the Prophet (pbuh) privacy in his own home. If the Prophet had been meeting people who told him what to say as a revelation from God, this would not have been hidden for very long. The extremely prominent Quraish nobles who followed the Prophet and accepted Islam were wise and intelligent men who would have easily noticed anything suspicious about the way in which the Prophet brought the revelations to them - more so since the Prophetic mission lasted 23 years. The enemies of the Prophet kept a close watch on him in order to find proof for their claim that he was a liar - they could not point out even a single instance when the Prophet may have had a secret rendezvous with particular Jews and Christians. It is inconceivable that any human author of the Qur’an would have accepted a situation in which he received no credit whatsoever for originating the Qur’an. Thus, historically and logically it cannot be established that there was a human source for the Qur’an. 6. MUHUMMAD (PBUH) WAS AN ILLITERATE The theory that Muhummad (pbuh) authored the Qur’an or copied from other sources can be disproved by the single historical fact that he was illiterate. Allah testifies Himself in the Qur’an In Surah Al-Ankabut chapter no.29 verse 48 "And thou was not (able) to recite a Book before this (Book came), nor art thou (able) to transcribe it with thy right hand: in that case, indeed, would the talkers of vanities have doubted." [Al-Qur’an 29:48] Allah (swt) knew that many would doubt the authenticity of the Qur’an and would ascribe it to Prophet Muhummad (pbuh). Therefore Allah in His Divine Wisdom chose the last and final Messenger to be an ‘Ummi’, i.e. unlettered, so that the talkers of vanity would not then have the slightest justification to doubt the Prophet. The accusation of his enemies that he had copied the Qur’an from other sources and rehashed it all in a beautiful language might have carried some weight, but even this flimsy pretence has been deprived to the unbeliever and the cynic. Allah reconfirms in the Qur’an in Surah Al A’raf chapter 7 verse 157: "Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered Prophet, whom they find mentioned in their own (Scriptures) in the Law and the Gospel" The prophecy of coming of the unlettered Prophet (pbuh) is also mentioned in the Bible in the book of Isaiah chapter 29 verse 12. "And the book is delivered to him that is not learned." [Isaiah 29:12] The Qur’an testifies in no less than four different places that the Prophet (pbuh) was illiterate. It is also mentioned in Surah A’raf chapter 7 verse 158 and in Surah Al-Jumu’a chapter 62 verse 2. 7. ARABIC VERSION OF THE BIBLE WAS NOT PRESENT The Arabic version of the Bible was not present at the time of Prophet Muhummad (pbuh). The earliest Arabic version of the Old Testament is that of R. Saadias Gaon of 900 C.E. - more than 250 years after the death of our beloved Prophet. The oldest Arabic version of the new Testament was published by Erpenius in 1616 C.E. - about a thousand years after the demise of our Prophet. 8. SIMILARITIES IN THE QUR’AN AND THE BIBLE DUE TO COMMON SOURCE Similarities between the Qur’an and the Bible does not necessarily mean that the former has been copied from the latter. In fact it gives evidence that both of them are based on a common third source; all divine revelations came from the same source - the one universal God. No matter what human changes were introduced into some of these Judeo-Christian and other older religious scriptures that had distorted their originality, there are some areas that have remained free from distortion and thus are common to many religions. It is true that there are some similar parallels between the Qur’an and the Bible but this is not sufficient to accuse Muhummad (pbuh) of compiling or copying from the Bible. The same logic would then also be applicable to teachings of Christianity and Judaism and thus one could wrongly claim that Jesus (pbuh) was not a genuine Prophet (God forbid) and that he simply copied from the Old Testament. The similarities between the two signify a common source that is one true God and the continuation of the basic message of monotheism and not that the later prophets have plagiarised from the previous prophets. If someone copies during an examination he will surely not write in the answer sheet that he has copied from his neighbour or Mr. XYZ. Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) gave due respect and credit to all the previous prophets (pbut). The Qur’an also mentions the various revelations given by Almighty God to different prophets. 9. MUSLIMS BELIEVE IN THE TAURAH, ZABOOR, INJEEL AND QUR’AN Four revelations of Allah (swt) are mentioned by name in the Qur’an: the Taurah, the Zaboor, the Injeel and the Qur’an. Taurah, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Moosa (a. s.) i.e. Moses (pbuh). Zaboor, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Dawood (a.s.) i.e. David (pbuh). Injeel, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Isa (A.S.) ie. Jesus (pbuh). ‘Al-Qur’an’, the last and final Wahi i.e. revelation given to the last and final Messenger Muhammad (pbuh). It is an article of faith for every Muslim to believe in all the Prophets of God and all revelations of God. However, the present day Bible has the first five books of the Old Testament attributed to Moses and the Psalms attributed to David. Moreover the New Testament or the four Gospels of the New Testament are not the Taurah, the Zaboor or the Injeel, which the Qur’an refers to. These books of the present day Bible may partly contain the word of God but these books are certainly not the exact, accurate and complete revelations given to the prophets. The Qur’an presents all the different prophets of Allah as belonging to one single brotherhood; all had a similar prophetic mission and the same basic message. Because of this, the fundamental teachings of the major faiths cannot be contradictory, even if there has been a considerable passage of time between the different prophetic missions, because the source of these missions was one: Almighty God, Allah. This is why the Qur’an says that the differences which exist between various religions are not the responsibility of the prophets, but of the followers of these prophets who forgot part of what they had been taught, and furthermore, misinterpreted and changed the scriptures. The Qur’an cannot therefore be seen as a scripture which competes with the teachings of Moses, Jesus and the other prophets. On the contrary, it confirms, completes and perfects the messages that they brought to their people. Another name for the Qur’an is the ‘The Furqan’ which means the criteria to judge the right from the wrong, and it is on the basis of the Qur’an that we can decipher which part of the previous scriptures can be considered to be the word of God. May Allah guide you