Why is google hating me? Please review.

Discussion in 'Websites' started by saintdw, Dec 27, 2005.

  1. #1
    www.dneprimport.com

    This site is 1 year old as of few days ago.


    Yahoo loves me, MSN is not bad either.


    Google thinks I dont exist.

    I have a sub page even listed in DMOZ, as well as decent amout of links.

    Im not even in top 500 results.

    Is there some kind of penalty hitting me? I've never seen people stuck in sand box for a year or more really.
     
    saintdw, Dec 27, 2005 IP
  2. ServerUnion

    ServerUnion Peon

    Messages:
    3,611
    Likes Received:
    296
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    They have you indexed, might just be the keywords that you are targeting.

    I see that all of you homepage content in dynamic, might try putting some better static text that will target the keywords that you are going for. Try then.

    Keep building links and content and wait. About all you can do... Good luck
     
    ServerUnion, Dec 27, 2005 IP
  3. saintdw

    saintdw Peon

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I suppose. I had an idea about static content. A little introductory type thing with keywords.

    It is 100% dynamically generated.

    I guess i should go on another link building campaign.

    99% of my links are one way and most are from directories but i have a few links from authority sites as well.

    Should i start doing link exchanges?
     
    saintdw, Dec 27, 2005 IP
  4. angelfire

    angelfire Peon

    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    69
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    Google is not hating you. You already had a PR. I agree on what they said you should re-consider your targeted keywords and put some additional contents with your keywords.
    Good luck and Happy New Year ('',)
     
    angelfire, Dec 27, 2005 IP
  5. saintdw

    saintdw Peon

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5

    My targeted keywords are fine... nothing to reconsider here.
     
    saintdw, Dec 28, 2005 IP
  6. angelfire

    angelfire Peon

    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    69
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Im just telling what I think you should do. Link exchange is a good idea.
     
    angelfire, Dec 28, 2005 IP
  7. redQueen

    redQueen Peon

    Messages:
    667
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    Google is not hating you, you might be targetting highly competitive keywords that's all. the site looks ok. you got pr so I'd say you got good backlinks.

    But you need more backlinks. You only got 21 samplings from google. Google likes backlinks. MSN and Yahoo's SE rankings will rise along with optimizing for Google.
     
    redQueen, Dec 28, 2005 IP
  8. vrsane

    vrsane Active Member

    Messages:
    465
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #8
    site looks great.. has all the things it needs.... getting more links in other sites will definalty boost a lot...
     
    vrsane, Dec 28, 2005 IP
  9. saintdw

    saintdw Peon

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    12
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9

    Yep, you're right.

    Time to start another link building campaign :D
     
    saintdw, Dec 28, 2005 IP
  10. mjewel

    mjewel Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,693
    Likes Received:
    514
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    360
    #10
    You need a lot more relevant backlinks. Forum links have very little value. While google doesn't show all backlinks, it's a good way to compare it to other sites. I only see about 5 relevant backlinks being shown by google - which isn't nearly enough.

    You can have the best on-site optimization, but without relevant backlinks, you aren't likely ever going to rank well with google for any competitive keywords.
     
    mjewel, Dec 28, 2005 IP