Why Iran cannot have Nuclear weapons?

If there is dictator then there should be headache of that nation.If the man (dictator) is such foolish person to decide nuclear attack in bad mood then how that kind of foolish person can stay in power ??????????
Foolish cannot rule !!!

 

i m from turkey. iran is our neighbour country.

 

Welcome to Digital Point my friend

 

I know its really nice place and every country has innocent people. But still people hesitate to enter in pak than india which is quite safe.

 

this is why I hate religions...get a brain fuckheads.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_Americans_Knew

http://www.themiddleeastnow.com/ifamericansknew

 

Ah yes Gtech, A prime example of bad information on Wiki. Those 2 articles you posted surely are from a (not) nuetral source, who surely present (no) facts to support they're claims and do nothing but bad mouth the organization.

 

Do you hate the "700 club" too

How about Jerry Falwell

 

Looks like they are more than adequately documented to me. Many external references, pie charts, clear documentation of her fraud. Looks like you stumbled onto yet another gem

 

Yes, I especially liked how your biased source tried to deny the 65 UN resolutions didn't target Israel, then posted the 65 UN resolutions and said since they all say the same thing there really isn't 65 of them..

The whole reason there's 65 resolutions is because Israel doesn't listen and ignores the resolutions (the entire point they were trying to make).

http://ifamericansknew.org/stats/un.html

 

Perhaps a course in reading comprehension is in order?

There's no denial, they just all have the same wording over and over and over again. But, your Israel hating source tries to magnify it for impact.

Which one would you say describes you best, yo-yo?

 

Really, by stating a fact that there is 65 UN resolutions about Israel is now "magnifying it for impact"? The FACTS magnify things for impact eh? I'm glad we know where you stand on FACTS.

 

I ate
I ate lunch
I ate lunch today
I ate lunch today at Applebees
I ate lunch today at Applebees and had an appetizer
I ate lunch today at Applebees and had an appetizer followed with a sandwhich
I ate lunch today at Applebees and had an appetizer followed with a sandwhich with iced tea to drink.
I ate lunch today at Applebees and had an appetizer followed with a sandwhich with iced tea to drink. After that, I had desert.
I ate lunch today at Applebees and had an appetizer followed with a sandwhich with iced tea to drink. After that, I had desert.The desert was apple pie.

The fact? I ate. They are all repeats. But if you fall into one of these groups, I suspect you won't change your mind:

That's the fact, jack

 

Iran leader said he wanted to wipe out the entire Anglo-Saxon race.
Iran leader said islam will take over the world.

I wouldn't care if the government spends a few billion going to war with Iran to be honest if the media which reported those statements were reliable.

I don't think any countries led by a strong active, fundamentalist religious belief should have Nukes, especially religions like islam which tends to be violent and aggressive (I don't care what the aging muslim "Community Leader" says about islam, the kind of is always on the news when muslims do something wrong, always saying that these muslims dont represent islam).

 

I'm not standing up for the idiots burning down embassys and the like. But to make a comparison, would you say the IRA represent christianity? Are they Christian Terrorists? Do they represent the whole of Ireland?

No, they're not and they don't.

If you feel that strongly why don't you go outside and beat up the first few Muslims you come accross?

That's how redicious it is.

 

When the leader, prime minister or president of another country claims his belief will spread around the world and he wants to kill me because of my race, I don't think that country should be allowed nuclear weapons.

A leader, prime minister or president is the closest thing towards a representation of a country in a democracy (Please don't refer this to America and Bush, as we know not everyone likes Bush).

For the record, I dislike most religions. I don't see why people are willing to die for a 1400 year old islam concept, extremely young when humanity has been around for millions of years.

 

My comment is still unanswered how foolish can rule long ?????
How foolish can be selected thru democrazy ?

 

I just don't like when a people get judged by their leaders. But, that's a fair point - I didn't actually look into that. (*goes off to read*)

Although I don't think any country needs nukes.

 

Same here, they are a deterrent, if everyone has them, noone will attack each other, but that just makes them a waste of time and money. I read somewhere that the Royal Navy has nuclear submarines which cost £2 billion each? But I'd probably be more pissed if I was American, the amount of money they spend on defence is unthinkable.

 

It is reasonable thinking that no one should have nukes.BUT IF any super power can hold then every one should have NUKES