Weren't you the one who just called japan an ant culture? He was talking about statistics that are REAL, you made actual baseless insults to a race. Liberals have some weird wonderland reality.
And please enlighten me as to when we as voters voted for the law as opposed to those that create them. You are a bit confused it seems.
So what you are saying is all racists are liberals? You too sound like you are confused. But you got your insulting buzz word in.
You do realize that is pretty much one and the same noppid. If you don't like the laws the make elect someone else. You can even start referendums/propositions in your state on laws, so technically you can vote your laws. Well, atleast, before the civil war, states were technically their own countries banded together for defense, and in all states they had a voting system where you could vote on laws, vote on state decisions even. It wasn't until after kings lincoln and fdr that we lost all those state's rights.
Most recent example thats an item of debate would be gay marriage.... Abortion in the Dakota's, cigarette taxes in California.. need more?
Exactly. All the state's rights we have, atleast the few that are left now. Democrats have succeeded in concentrating most powers into a federal dictatorship now. And liberal republicans like Bush and Nixon made it worse.
The poverty rate has gone down for all three of those 'races', but the same can't be said about the crime comparably. If you've read what I wrote, then you'll understand that I imply there's many factors (that I'm not throughly aware of), which seem to affect the statistics I've read....one definitely could be poverty. Although I would assume others are: a fatherless home, the neighborhood, local drug use, sexual behaviour, belief systems, and leadership...among just a few. I personally don't believe just because you have the opportunity you'll find people taking them. It's a matter of how good that seems as an alternative. Ones background and surrounding may affect ones decesions as much or even more so at times, then the actual physical opportunities held at arms length. Yes, it does. New Hampshire is high on ever standard of living.
No I wasn't. I don't see how any word I said of that implied that. Learn to read. And there was no insult either. Man what conversation did you see? The only insult was by liberal ferret against japs, and it's liberals on the forums making baseless accusations that all republicans are racist. Try to be civil, and don't just go into democratic "attacks w/out facts" mode. Probably because you can't handle the truth. That harsh punishments deter crime. Like they do in Japan, the industrialized country with the lowest crime rate, where there are two criminals hanged by lotto per year, and criminals have to kneel on concrete all day to repent as opposed to hotel ritz in our prisons in the USA, many people "on the street" prefer prison to their normal lives. But I guess you won't accept that your precious democratic party is WRONG on atleast that issue provably.
Good point. I like Japanese people I've met. I find that insult rather tasteless. My family at large has black, latin, white, asian, gay, liberal, conservative...about everything you can think of. Some of us do exist on 'stereotypes', but not throughly. Stereotypes didn't come from voids,...most do apply to SOME people. That's the basis of my thoughts. Statistics give you a general view of what's going on, but it doesn't give you the full context, in which I would never....ever... assert that one race is superior to the next. I do think that certain beliefs systems are better to certain ends, but that has nothing to do with skin. Skin is rather an abitrary thing.
Its not insult to say japanese culture is very rules based and guilt and shame based or to me ant like, they are proud of that. What rick said is basically that if everyone turned black the crime rate would go up, infering that the color of ones skin is directly linked to criminal activitiy. might not be what you meant but its what you said well then why do you attribute race to lower crime and not the standard of living?
The way you use dictarship is a bit unfair, but I understand what's you're try to say....and generally I agree. I think Democrats appoint terrible judges, and those judges really help pass what I consider unlawful agendas. Bush for one, is not good for the principles of conservativism. He makes it look like a joke, and really divides conservatives up, rather than bring the bases support. He could easily do that if he tried. But real conservative rarely get up to the high-end leadership of the repub party, and are vaguely appealed to.
I don't understand how people throw around the words racism and racist like it was free money or something... mind blowing. So on that note, lets lay down some logic: Africa=black (or are shall we call them african africans to be PC?)=shithole Mid East= arab, mid eastern and persian=shithole Asia= Asians (or Oriental for your Euro's)=moderate Latin America=latins=shithole Europe=caucasion=the pinacle of the human endeavor. prove me wrong. prove me racist.
Ahh, Africa, the crime-free zone. Gotta love the liberal mind. Keep in mind no white man ever went over and "caught" slaves. Rival tribes captured each other and quite literally "sold each other out". Asians came over to America with nothing, worked basically as slaves, and had discriminatory laws against them. Yet asians have a lower crime rate than even whites, make more median income than any other race, and have better education. Why? Because of the intrinsic values of asian culture, to work really hard, etc. Whereas black culture is.... well.... you know. I'm not racist, that's why I'm not blind to the suffering they cause to themselves and the liberals who won't help them. Bill Cosby's being crucified for standing up to his own race. You have reverend jesse jackson and al sharpton (wearing a $18,000 rolex) and all other liberals basically telling black people they can't succeed on their own so they need government handouts. That's racism! Asians had everything going against them, being basically forced into a similar type of slavery themselves originally. Yet asians have the lowest crime rate. Yet you won't see asians asking for reperations over the slave labor to build the transcontinental railroad. You don't see asians crying about their economic situation. As a matter of fact, they rolled up their sleeves, got working, and are now are the race with the highest median income.
What REALLY pisses me off is calling blacks "African Americans". Like they are some type of sub-domain of Americans... disgusting.
Well and it divides loyalty. As Teddy Roosevelt said "America has no room for hyphenated americans" "America has no room for dividied loyalties" and that Americans must all speak english or we have nothing in common and are doomed to failure.
Wrong. I didn't say if we 'turned' into a certain race the crime would go up or down,... that would be a silly assertion. No one is turning white or black or asian or latin. I was being comparable. I was restricting the demographics, and isolating what can easily be determined out of those statistics. Ever heard of the silly term 'white america'. Obviously America isn't 'white', it's just a term used to describe a particular group within a racial sect. This is why people tend not to explore this issue, because people can't explore the topic within isolation. They tend to misperceive it as rascist. But a person paying attention to context will know it's not. Read what I wrote, and think. There are many factors (therefore I'm not attibuting it to just one), but races is an important one, because it often implies a factor not spoken of. People tend to cling to 'their own', which often is an effectual factor in itself. Is it justifiable to say that a man surrounded only by his own race, could very well be different then a man surrounded by many other races? Would the differences be even be more so with special friends of another race? The fuzziness of looking at statistics is that you find it hard to attribute one thing to something. Like war, it usually is many and often isn't clear. I look at the statistics and I say there is a problem with some people in certain racial backgrounds, even more so than it seems in others. That's not a false statement. I don't assert that there's one particular reason, therefore I'm neither being racist or being wrong.
you guys are blowing my mind, I can't believe you are stupid enough not to be embarssed by what you are saying half of my family is from latin america, not all of it a is a shithole yet again just let right wing people talk long enough and they will show that they are racist bigots
Where do you live ferret? Would you consider moving to anywhere but an North American -or- European nation? Why or why not? If it is wrong, please, show me how it is wrong. Never said "all of it". The is Rio De Janaro(sp?), there is Dubai and South Africa as well... but as a general rule, people EMMIGRATE from those regions to Europe or North America. if I am wrong, tell me why that is? How is it racist to point out facts about global regions being better there or worse here?