Why Are You All Against Vista

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by rlineker, May 27, 2007.

?

XP or Vista

  1. Windows Vista

    379 vote(s)
    28.5%
  2. Windoews XP

    950 vote(s)
    71.5%
  1. z_kingtut

    z_kingtut Peon

    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #841
    Why Are You All Against Vista ?:confused: :mad:
     
    z_kingtut, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  2. techpr

    techpr Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #842
    Still with doubts? ;)
     
    techpr, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  3. The General

    The General Peon

    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #843
    Because it's a bad product.
     
    The General, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  4. KeyboardHustler

    KeyboardHustler Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,087
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #844
    Vista seems to take like 50% of my friends computers CPU even tho he just bought it. Vista is not good if you want to play advanced games or do a lot of things at the same time =)
     
    KeyboardHustler, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  5. imagize

    imagize Peon

    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #845
    Am I the only one who thinks it's funny that everyone was saying the exact same thing about windows XP in 2001?

    Humans hate change, we don't like to move out of our comfort zone.

    The current computer architecture has reached it's limits. If people do not get off windows XP (or use linux :p) computer technology cannot continue to evolve.

    The current computer architecture supports a max of 4 GB of memory. That is not just RAM it includes all kinds of memory. Some Vista users may have noticed that they have 4 GB RAM in their system and only 3GB is available. (This is not a vista flaw) This is because they have other memory taking up space (graphics cards). It doesn't matter what kind of memory it is, in the 32bit system you can have 4GB MAX.

    If anyone is pushing new operating systems it is the cpu makers. Some of you may not realize but your CPU was designed for 64BIT. The popular intel core 2 duo processor is a 64 bit processor that most people use for 32 bit.

    Vista ships with both a 32 bit version and a 64 bit version. Ubuntu linux has a 64 bit version and I am sure other distributions do as well. Like it or not winxp 64bit will never be supported as much as vista 64 bit. So eventually you will have to upgrade like it or not.

    Like i said, everyone complained about XP all those years ago and now we are simply going through the cycles once again.

    By the way I don't actually have vista on my home computer and I prefer to use linux. So this is not biased.
     
    imagize, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  6. snowbird

    snowbird Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,036
    Likes Received:
    395
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #846
    IMO Vista is a pile of manure, but most MS products are
     
    snowbird, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  7. Bigvick

    Bigvick Peon

    Messages:
    303
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #847
    I am not against Vista - I even tried out the ultimate edition

    XP has been perfected and there is no real reason to switch...
     
    Bigvick, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  8. tiller2dapiller

    tiller2dapiller Active Member

    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #848
    I personally dont like vista's look at all. I think the sidebar and everything look horrid :\ XP anyday
     
    tiller2dapiller, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  9. D_C

    D_C Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #849
    I accept change, and have used windows vista. I still prefer windows XP. Why? Mainly because there are way to many kinks and flaws in vista that they have been working to fix. I don't plan on getting vista until they make a service pack of some sort to make up for having to update the literally hundreds of updates.

    Until the new technology is actually good and useful, without to many annoying flaws (there will always be some) I wont use it. End of story.
     
    D_C, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  10. techpr

    techpr Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #850
    techpr, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  11. Steve Mount

    Steve Mount Peon

    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #851
    I'll stick with XP ... it works great! :)
     
    Steve Mount, Oct 15, 2007 IP
  12. j_o

    j_o Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    516
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    113
    #852
    because it is horrible
     
    j_o, Oct 16, 2007 IP
  13. D_C

    D_C Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    160
    #853
    We are against vista because XP works fine for right now.
     
    D_C, Oct 16, 2007 IP
  14. sunbux

    sunbux Peon

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #854
    XP Still works for me. No need to change.

    Maybe will try some Open Source solution in the near feature.
     
    sunbux, Oct 16, 2007 IP
  15. techpr

    techpr Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #855
    I´m posting this using a Laptop from my Wife job. This is a (BRAND NEW just 2 weeks) Acer Dual Core T2080 1.7Ghz with 512MB RAM and you know.... Vista Home Premium.

    I cannot install any software like Firefox etc because this is not ours.

    Man this thing is horrible, painful slow, I want to throw it against the wall. Just using IE7 alone, Vista consumes almost all the available RAM (around 478MB).

    There is no way you can be productive using 512MB with Vista.
     
    techpr, Oct 16, 2007 IP
  16. The General

    The General Peon

    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #856
    Yuck, Acer! Acer and Vista............*vomits*.
     
    The General, Oct 17, 2007 IP
  17. fouzie

    fouzie Peon

    Messages:
    236
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #857
    simple, some program doesn't run on vista, so I go with the eXPerienced one
     
    fouzie, Oct 17, 2007 IP
  18. worldman

    worldman Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,337
    Likes Received:
    261
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    225
    #858
    Two. If you understand anything about business sometimes companies spend money on things that are not needed for the company to prosper but are needed for the employees moral. A prime example is installing a gym or kitchen. It builds up moral among workers. Its the same thing when companies do renovations.

    Vista not only provides better security (which up to now you have not been able to prove otherwise) but its also a change.
     
    worldman, Oct 17, 2007 IP
  19. night|shift

    night|shift Peon

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #859
    I like Windows Vista very much and used the business version. It's the best windows ever.
    I never experienced crashs and the Design is very nice.
    I actually use XP, however, because of my Soundcard, which doesn't work well under vista - the digital outputs don't work..

    ~
     
    night|shift, Oct 17, 2007 IP
  20. markab10

    markab10 Peon

    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #860
    Microsoft usually takes a year to get the bugs sorted out in a new version of Windows. So I will wait until then.
     
    markab10, Oct 17, 2007 IP