Why Are You All Against Vista

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by rlineker, May 27, 2007.

?

XP or Vista

  1. Windows Vista

    379 vote(s)
    28.5%
  2. Windoews XP

    950 vote(s)
    71.5%
  1. lanmonkey

    lanmonkey Active Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #41

    but it isnt, its a bloted version of a previous microsoft OS with a new user interface that makes people think its new. if you look under the hood you will see it mostly the same with very few really radical new features.

    until the software you need to use wont work on xp then why waste your time and money.
     
    lanmonkey, May 28, 2007 IP
  2. MeetHere

    MeetHere Prominent Member

    Messages:
    15,399
    Likes Received:
    994
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    330
    #42
    I have bought a new laptop 1 week back which came with Genuine Vista home basic edition..So I am going to keep it..

    I have 512 RAM and i think its not enough for vista.. Takes time for booting and shutting down.

    If you have enough RAM, then vista Rocks..
     
    MeetHere, May 28, 2007 IP
  3. zexy

    zexy Guest

    Messages:
    7,223
    Likes Received:
    348
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #43
    By 1 year from now, everyone will be using Vista, I'm sure.
    But right now WinXP is all I need, it's stable, it has drivers & software and it's established.
     
    zexy, May 28, 2007 IP
  4. rmartish

    rmartish Peon

    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #44
    Where protesting against bloated ware.
     
    rmartish, May 28, 2007 IP
  5. deluxdon

    deluxdon Catch Me If You Can...!!!™ Staff

    Messages:
    25,481
    Likes Received:
    1,943
    Best Answers:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #45
    Same here MeetHere. I have also bought a laptop within few days back which came with vista home basic edition with 512 RAM. Agree that it takes time for booting and shutting down :(

    Unable to install zonealarm on that, don't know why :confused: Anyone give me solution for that ??
     
    deluxdon, May 29, 2007 IP
  6. kasownik666

    kasownik666 Peon

    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #46
    Vista is just... ugly :) . And needs about 4GB ram :(
     
    kasownik666, May 29, 2007 IP
  7. deluxdon

    deluxdon Catch Me If You Can...!!!™ Staff

    Messages:
    25,481
    Likes Received:
    1,943
    Best Answers:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    480
    #47
    Who told you that :confused:

    1 GB is good enough IMO :)
     
    deluxdon, May 29, 2007 IP
  8. Josiah

    Josiah Banned

    Messages:
    438
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #48
    Simple answer...

    If your upgrading your computer GET VISTA...

    If you're not keep XP for another year...

    And BTW have atleast 1-2gb ram otherwise I bet its slow...

    Josiah
     
    Josiah, May 29, 2007 IP
  9. diarmuid

    diarmuid Peon

    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #49
    Hahah,

    half of the people here are criticising vista for being too pretty, and the other half are criticising vista for being too ugly, is there anything microsoft could have done, or should they just never make another operating system?!

    And you really only actually need 512MB of RAM, to run the basic side of vista, and with 1GB you will be running it relativley well, which these days isn't really any amount of RAM. For example I got a Windows Experience Index score of 4.9 for my RAM, which is 2gb, and the scores are out of 5, so 2, is the most you need to run vista quite fluently.
     
    diarmuid, May 29, 2007 IP
  10. sm9ai

    sm9ai Active Member

    Messages:
    746
    Likes Received:
    14
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #50
    The trouble with vista is the vista content protection

    I suggest everyone read up on it. It is some incredibly scary stuff and will effect virtually everyone!

    And vista is no more secure than XP. It still suffers from exactly the same kind of exploits that windows XP, Mac and Linux do. The RootKit Exploits which is so incredibly dangerous yet most people know so little about it.
     
    sm9ai, May 29, 2007 IP
  11. virusrulez

    virusrulez Peon

    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #51
    first it need high system configuration for installing second usually all software don't run on it
     
    virusrulez, May 29, 2007 IP
  12. rmartish

    rmartish Peon

    Messages:
    1,841
    Likes Received:
    26
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #52
    Why should the consumer have to buy a new computer just to run a bloated OS? It maked no sense at all.
     
    rmartish, May 29, 2007 IP
  13. candj

    candj Banned

    Messages:
    450
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #53
    Any way it needs very high configuration for the computer.
     
    candj, May 29, 2007 IP
  14. askax

    askax Peon

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #54
    not hate, its just microsoft tradition to have many security holes

    well at least I'll wait for SP1 then buy Vista :p
     
    askax, May 29, 2007 IP
  15. lanmonkey

    lanmonkey Active Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #55
    history speaks the truth. and microsoft are saying vista is secure, as if.
     
    lanmonkey, May 29, 2007 IP
  16. dj0471

    dj0471 Peon

    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #56
    I installed IE7 on my PC and the whole thing came carshing down around me. They don't insure that (and as someone once said, Linux is only free if your time is worth nothing) and I have had to reinstall to get back to where I once was.
    Vista - I'll give it two years and then maybe a new PC will have it installed for me. No cutting edge stuff for me..
     
    dj0471, May 29, 2007 IP
  17. mopacfan

    mopacfan Peon

    Messages:
    3,273
    Likes Received:
    164
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #57
    I highly doubt it. I think that this is the next Windows ME. A flop that people will forget ever existed.
     
    mopacfan, May 29, 2007 IP
  18. mate_pl

    mate_pl Active Member

    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    19
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #58
    Why throwing money in the wind? Vista needs more RAM, faster CPU, better graphics accelerator and more HDD space. For what? Eye candy? Better search (who ever used F3 anyway?)? I've been to Microsoft presentations of Vista and honestly haven't seen a thing to make me throw money for something slower than XP... My 2 cents...
     
    mate_pl, May 29, 2007 IP
  19. andru

    andru Peon

    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #59
    It still has a mil of bugs and poor comparability with old software ex. Visual studio 2003
     
    andru, May 29, 2007 IP
  20. lanmonkey

    lanmonkey Active Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #60
    you hit the nail on the head there.

    Microsoft have grown used to people rushing out and buying thier latest product... just because they have released it and it looks cool and its new....

    ever since windows 2000 there have been no massive improvments to thier operating systems because they didnt need them, win2k was cracking! so instead microsoft bloat it with junk and make it look flashy.
     
    lanmonkey, May 29, 2007 IP