I would hae to say the following Sir Sean Connery than Pierce Brosnan Daniel Craig hasn't done a bad job either
Sean Connery for me - he was just everything that Bond was ever supposed to be. Smooth, calm, and he has that perfect British gentleman aura that I think Macdonald envisaged when he created Bond. Daniel Craig isn't bad - but he's a little bit too macho for the part if you ask me.
Do you want to add a poll in this thread? If yes, Give me the list of the James Bond Actors so that I can put their all names. Thank You
Pierce Brosnan has tremendous style quotient, Daniel is very good at action scenes, Sean Connery had class and that voice(x-factor).........all of three have their strongest points......i love them all
of course Pierce Brosnan... i really dont understand what they thought when they cast Daniel Craig as a James Bond...
I think a lot of people have affection for Connery because he set the standard, but in terms of a brooding spy-type person, I think Craig fits the bill the best. I can believe that someone like him would be a spy, whereas Pierce Brosnan seems like someone who just got into it for the fun (he reminds me of a spoiled rich boy, whereas Craig looks like he was beat up in the streets all his youth). With the new technology and special effects, Craig's movies have been the best in my opinion. Would've liked to see what Connery could've done if he was ~30 to do the roles right now.
Sean Connery than Pierce Brosnan. Sean was absolutely the best. Pierce wasn't too bad himself but seriously Daniel Craig is a mess. His films might make more money but they don't carry that classic Bond appeal that Pierce and Sean could only give.