You guys can't prove shit except that you are insane! http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob1.htm http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm Notice these results from the above! NBC/Wall Street Journal 1/26-29/06 39% 54% Henny is a propagandist trying to prop up a failed administration that is going down like a plane on fire! Henny's crap report is not even on the list, it must be from the RNC....
You have to ask? Nearly 12,000 negative posts... The most of anyone here... Hmm.. There is nothing to "prove". We are simply disproving your false interpretation of reality.
Hi, It's good to see we are getting closer to the current time however January is still not quite February 7th. We are however making progress.
Still waiting for the CBS poll showing 35%....... Didn't think so, another made up fact brought to you from the angry white adolesant liberals... *Edit* Hey moron, looky looky http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm going up, lmao, go find some more data that fits your preconcieved lunacy. Rassmusen is FAR from right, lol.
Aside fromt that it also shows that: "The President's highest rating of 2005 was 54% on February 4. His lowest rating was 40% on October 28." I don't see any magic number 34 here.
from jermeys blog people who want birth control are irresponsible sluts? maybe they don't need those child tax credit to buy their houses?
Learn to read. They did not want birth control. They wanted abortion bills, ie., emergency contraception... That is not birth control. I believe in "birth control" methods, which prevent conception from ocurring, not killing after the fact, which is what they wanted. It's a personal preference for me. I don't think it should be illegal, but again, if you would have read the article you would have seen the stupidity involved in suing someone because you could not find something you wanted at their store. I go to stores all the time that do not have what I am looking for. If they don't I look somewhere else, I don't sue them. I wonder if the real problem with the left is that fact that they have both selective hearing and selective seeing disorders. Now go find some other thread to bother troll...
I don't mean to get back on the subject, but I think John Mcain will be the republican nominee. The VP nominee will be Joe Lieberman. IMHO
Thank you for bringing us back on subject! Don't be sorry for that! I think that is a nice combo... Mainly on the Lieberman side! McCain still strikes me as unstable in the head... You just never know when he might go off. Any split ticket out there like this that includes Lieberman, I'm there. Personally he is about the only hope the left has of doing anything. They would have stood a better chance in 2000 of running him for President.
Lieberman is fine with me. McCain and Lieberman would be an ok combo. I wouldn't complain. Anthony would, but I wouldn't.
Lieberman here too! It is funny how the Right Wing Nazi's on this board are all happy to have a Jewish Prez or VP. All we want is what is best for the country. Lieberman is a great politician because he puts America first, something the left abhores. For them the Democratic party is more important than the country itself.
Lieberman is like any politician. Remember when he ran with Gore? He completely changed all of his views to fit the ticket he was on. Politicians are all the same. Whatever fits their end goal is what they believe in.
I really don't think he changed any of his views. I think it is more like none of his views really mattered anyway. It was Gore that was running for President. Gore's deranged concept of reality and the parties message was all that was really mattered and all that was reported.
Like I've continually said... We are independant thinkers. I make my decisions in life based on the formation of my own opinions, but because some union told me too.
Before he was nominated in 2000 to be the VP candidate, lieberman was in favor of school vouchers - after he got the nomination he came out against them. Before 2000, he was also in favor of an investigation into the campaign finance tactics employed by Gore and clinton. After he became VP, he had a sudden change of heart. He was also hard line against Saddam pre 2000. During the election, he took a much softer approach. After the campaign, he quickly turned the other way. He also moderated his views on abortion to more fit the democratic position. There were lots of others too, it was odd because he was more a conservative democrat pre 2000, then became more liberal in 2000, then after 2000, became more conservative again. He's just a politician. They all are.
Im a bit confused by some of your one liner posts... No offense, but if you do not 'give a shit', why post? Why even bother participating in the thread?