Vote for the one who have most problems in arguing. Sorry if some people wasn't mentioned, but I can include on another poll if you want; "The best political character at DP". I will made that poll after this have been running for a few days(If I don't remember to do so, then someone else can take the initiative to do so). The winner of this poll will not be included in the next. Anyway, vote on and please leave a comment why you think that this person deserves the title.
Are you on crack? Sorry, but it took sometime to decide who that should be mentioned. I had more than 20 people on my mind, but only 10 could be mentioned, I couldn't even include Lordo
Sorry, but even though I sometimes, often even, disagree with some of the people on the list, I don't think any of them 'suck', politically or otherwise.
A lot of them do because they tend to twist the truth and lie. An example of that would be like what Will did in the recent hostage thread, then when you pick them up on it, they start to argue about the definition of the words and go completely off topic.
That was a great example of how one person misrepresents the facts of a case and how the others all need to come to his rescue and attempt to beat down and silence any/all opposition. A rather fascist approach, if you ask me. Some people disagreed with Will and posted corrections to his inaccurate report. The corrections were quickly met with hate and hostility by the usual gang of thugs under his control. Not surprising, really. It happens all the time here and everybody's seen it in numerous different threads. The hostage thread was just the most recent example. There are some who believe that each person has a valid opinion and that they are entitled to express it. Conversely, there are those who start hostage threads and sit back while the minions attempt to defend false information and take the public heat for them, while dishing out that hatred. BTW, Will, don't say I never do anything for you. I voted for you in the poll.
It was a great example of how one tries to correct and ends up getting corrected himself. Then proceeds to trivialize the heart the story by obscuring it out of shame. Then attempts to portray himself as a victim of fascism because he was corrected. But I'm sure it was nothing "personal."
^ Case in point. Will's "report" was missing far bigger pieces of the story than anyone who posted corrections to it, including myself. When you learn to think independantly of Will, you will come to realize that.
A breaking story often doesn't have all the information. I pointed that out, but apparently it never registered. It's not a penis contest. "His was bigger than mine" doesn't make an argument. Maybe you just can't let go and move on?
I don't know if Will twisted anything, but I don't think so since he's not that kind of arguer. Liberal leftists on the otherhand are twisting subjects on a regular matter wich makes it hard to get anything out of a discussion.
Really? I tried to see if he was but I didn't find anything. Why didn't you provide a proof such as links to his posts? And the rest of my post makes sense as well.
I was thinking about the list and settled on Tesla. Because no matter what shenanigans the others get up to, Tesla tops them for being completely insane