White House Releases President Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by GeorgeB., Apr 27, 2011.

  1. thesickearth

    thesickearth Active Member

    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #41
    He is not a Metisse, he is a Mulatto. Metis is half/white half Native American, basically, an average Mexican dude.
     
    thesickearth, Apr 28, 2011 IP
  2. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #42
    Rumor has it, had McCain won, the Dems had a full bevy of legal protests lined up to block his confirmation based on this exact allegation. It would have been the same shit as 2000 Florida as the Dems tried to delegitimize election results they were unhappy with. Thinking about it is enough to make me want to start a birther website.

    In other news, the Obama admin is now punishing news agencies and reporters who report news Obama doesn't like. This is actually old news, since the Obama admin has been doing this with Fox since day one. What makes the story really interesting is that the newspaper is the San Francisco Chronicle, and the reporter was probably one of his biggest supporters:


    Another reminder of why the presidents numbers are once again tanking. The independents and conservatives abandoned him in the first three months of his presidency. Now the left is seeing through the smooth exterior. They are slow, but they catch on eventually.
     
    Obamanation, Apr 28, 2011 IP
  3. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #43
    Ever heard of figure of speech ? You've created a thread and glorified his gesture like it was the cure for AIDS . The only thing that fits perfectly is your lack respect for other's opinions :)


    Would you be so kind as to point what arguments of mine you refuted ?

    Quite unfortunate for you this is a forum and your lack of arguments that back up your opinion will e on display for a huge amount time . A intelligent person would consider his words . Don't you think so ?
     
    ApocalypseXL, Apr 29, 2011 IP
  4. Breeze Wood

    Breeze Wood Peon

    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #44

    You really do need to get outside, O.......there were no merits to the elections outcome, they stole it from Republicans.
     
    Breeze Wood, Apr 29, 2011 IP
  5. fastreplies

    fastreplies Banned

    Messages:
    2,336
    Likes Received:
    107
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #45
    I have better idea.
    Why don't we make Obama to take IQ test and then compare it to Donald's Trump and
    to the rest of presidential candidates in Republican Party and... we gotch yah Obama.

    :)

    fastreplies
     
    fastreplies, Apr 29, 2011 IP
  6. robjones

    robjones Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,256
    Likes Received:
    405
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #46
    That's one of your more readable posts and it still doesnt make sense. Though there was voter fraud perpetrated by Obama's ACORN buddies, he'd have won without it. The election wasn't "stolen" by anyone, the GOP just lost. That's how elections work, only one side can win.

    I didnt vote for Obama for several reasons, and none involved race. Didnt like...
    -- his lack of real experience,
    -- his choices of associations (the good reverend, Bill Ayres, ACORN),
    -- the fact that he lied about his history with Ayres,
    -- his actions when working for Annenberg foundation,
    -- his wife's income magically rocketed when he was elected to his first office and pointed an earmark toward her employer,
    -- history of shirking the hard calls... his voting record included voting "present" way too often,
    -- what scant voting record showed him against the 2nd amendment. I'd rather the president support ALL the bill of rights, not just their favorites ​
    Those, not skin color, are the type things voters *should* be considering.

    Still, the criteria to vote says you have to be a citizen, it doesnt mention that you have to be well informed. It doesnt even say you cant be a bigoted butthead... the KKK and the Black Panthers can vote as long as they have citizenship and havent lost privs thru convictions for criminal actions.

    Racism is ugly and stupid, but exists among SOME on either side
    I'm sure Obama lost the vote of any anti-black racists. I'm just as I'm sure he gained the vote of some pro-black racists. Heck, there was a preacher in the church he regularly attended who was filmed saying Hillary felt "white entitlement" Watch the video.

    [video=youtube;fA7ULgcPyf0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA7ULgcPyf0[/video]

    Pure and simple, there were SOME racists on both sides of the vote, and SOME non-racists on both sides of the vote. Anyone that assumes everyone that voted against Obama is a racist is themself guilty of applying unrealistic and bigoted stereotypes.

    Even Saturday night Live... about as Liberal a group you'll find...
    Poked fun at the way Hillary Clinton was given standard political treatment by the media while Obama was tossed softball questions and praise.
    See - Hillary Clinton recalls SNL parody: Does Obama want pillow? - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYxbRY8MVKc

    Claims Obama was singled out for torture because of his race are a bit thin
    The media treated him with kid gloves even before he was the nominee. Any other candidate that'd had cozy relations with ACORN, Ayres, or Jer Wright and the other idiots that manned the pulpit in the seriously racist church he attended... wouldve been eaten alive by the media... but Obama's past and much of his present (including a relative in the country illegally) were downplayed.

    The networks could make it to Alaska to check out the smallest detail about Palin's past, but were amazingly uninterested in any irregularities on the part of Obama that wouldve been front page stuff for any other candidate. Partially the pro-Obama media blitz was the making of limousine liberals, the kind that fly fuel guzzling private jets to conferences about alternative energy, wanting to pat themselves on the back for their largesse and open-mindedness by electing "the first black president". The fact that his track record showed a heavy influence of socialism probably helped too, but it sounded better to push him as the first black president than the first socialist president.

    To those suggesting he has been unfairly treated due to his color: Answer this....
    Do you REALLY think Oprah wouldve had tears in her eyes as she told her millions of sycophants he's "The One" if he'd been a white guy from Georgia with a similar voting record? If not, acknowledge that color can play both for and against a candidate. It shouldnt do either, and those that vote either for or against someone on the basis of race are idiots... but it clearly happens both ways.

    The fact that it does happen is not an indictment of anyone but the ones that do it. Not favoring Obama for a first term (or a second) is NOT evidence of racism, any more than being in favor of him winning means you hate whites. Both would be silly generalizations ungrounded in fact.
     
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2011
    robjones, Apr 29, 2011 IP
  7. Breeze Wood

    Breeze Wood Peon

    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #47

    Obama 365 electoral votes - McCain 173 votes.


    r, I was just joking with your buddy about his claim the Democrats would use a "bevy of legal protests" including McCain's birth certificate were he the nominee - the outcome was never in doubt, not stolen by ACORN at all.

    I suppose everyone now understands Trump was not stereotyping Obama two years after being sworn into office by your post - good job.
     
    Breeze Wood, Apr 29, 2011 IP
  8. robjones

    robjones Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,256
    Likes Received:
    405
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #48
    Gee, my post required thought. Yours required a keyboard. Some things in life are constant I guess.
     
    robjones, Apr 29, 2011 IP
  9. Breeze Wood

    Breeze Wood Peon

    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #49


    Your post may have required some thought (?) but I am not sure it was the thought of the thread you had in mind.

    Was Trump et al the Republican Party stereotyping or not?
     
    Breeze Wood, Apr 29, 2011 IP
  10. robjones

    robjones Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,256
    Likes Received:
    405
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #50
    Breeze, I addressed the birth cert way farther up in the thread. Repeating it isn't likely to improve your comprehension.
     
    robjones, Apr 29, 2011 IP
  11. Breeze Wood

    Breeze Wood Peon

    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #51
    I am just not sure you did address the subject. The issue of the thread is stereotyping after 2 years into a presidency long after adequate proof of the short form was made public - Was Trump stereotyping an African American to gain political advantage - present day.
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2011
    Breeze Wood, Apr 30, 2011 IP
  12. Seqqa

    Seqqa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,695
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #52
    We need George Bush back at least he's so stupid it's entertaining to watch.
     
    Seqqa, Apr 30, 2011 IP
  13. robjones

    robjones Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,256
    Likes Received:
    405
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #53
    Breeze needs to look up what stereotyping means. His vocabulary issues are causing him to make ridiculous claims.
     
    robjones, Apr 30, 2011 IP
  14. fastreplies

    fastreplies Banned

    Messages:
    2,336
    Likes Received:
    107
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #54
    @Rob

    Let me ask you something.
    Do you believe that Hawaiians who are using the same Certificate as Obama
    admitted for electoral scrutiny more than 2 years ago are not Citizens of US?

    :confused:

    fastreplies
     
    fastreplies, Apr 30, 2011 IP
  15. Breeze Wood

    Breeze Wood Peon

    Messages:
    2,130
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #55


    I'm not sure what does not fit the definition per Trumps insistence President Obama must produce additional proof than what was already legally binding and made public for his citizenship prior to the 08 election.

    If you believe there was any legitimacy to the charade by Trump and the particens......just say so.

    Our congregation condemns the work of the Crucifiers and only by their being brought to justice will mankind be again on track to discover the true path for Remission.
     
    Breeze Wood, Apr 30, 2011 IP
  16. ApocalypseXL

    ApocalypseXL Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,095
    Likes Received:
    103
    Best Answers:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    240
    #56
    I'm gonna go try something different and try to reason with you . Please answer this two questions :

    What church / congregation do you belong to ?

    How often do you use pot or other leisure drugs ?
     
    ApocalypseXL, Apr 30, 2011 IP
  17. robjones

    robjones Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,256
    Likes Received:
    405
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #57
    Not sure what you're confused about. My first post categorized the birth certificate thing as a "sideshow" that detracts from legitimate election issues.

    I don't expect breeze to understand that having taken that position means I'm not the one to defend the birth certificate question as being important. You otoh ARE capable of making that connection.
     
    robjones, Apr 30, 2011 IP
  18. fastreplies

    fastreplies Banned

    Messages:
    2,336
    Likes Received:
    107
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #58
    It just something you said in here kind of confusing me.

    :)

    fastreplies
     
    fastreplies, Apr 30, 2011 IP
  19. robjones

    robjones Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,256
    Likes Received:
    405
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #59
    No mystery there... Candidates for public office from mayor to president to supreme court nominee are always put under a microscope. In obamas case there's an aunt that was living in the country illegally. See Google.

    Just as Jimmy Carter caught flack about his brother Billy and Nixon caught fire over his brother, Reagan got attention for his son, Palin caught flack about her kid, etc... Obamas aunt brought him a little attention. That has nothing to do with his birth certificate. Anybody that doesn't want that sorta stuff looked at can only avoid it by avoiding public office.

    I was just pointing out that Obama got a lot more kid glove treatment on stuff like that than most politicians have. I'm not the only one to notice the press gave him a lot of softball treatment... It isn't even an observation limited to those on "the right", unless SNL is right-wing media.
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2011
    robjones, Apr 30, 2011 IP