Which Web Design Is Better For My Relaxation Music Website?

Discussion in 'Websites' started by MusicMeFree.com, Dec 16, 2009.

  1. #1
    Hi Everyone,

    I am juggling around two different website designs for my relaxation music website, and was wondering which design I should go with. I look at them every day and too often so have become blind as to which to go with.

    Design #1:

    http://musicmefree.com/1h

    Design #2:

    http://musicmefree.com/1G

    As a new visitor to my website which design would be more attractive to you so that you would stick around and see what is offered?

    Thanks in advance.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2009
    MusicMeFree.com, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  2. river

    river Active Member

    Messages:
    1,632
    Likes Received:
    54
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    88
    #2
    h1 is better imo. I would just tone down the header.
     
    river, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  3. MusicMeFree.com

    MusicMeFree.com Peon

    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    Thank you river. I made the music rainbow header lighter.
     
    MusicMeFree.com, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  4. jameshu

    jameshu Greenhorn

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    #4
    1G is better I think, but the both pages have too many text, for a music site, it should be more colorful.
     
    jameshu, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  5. kazi

    kazi Peon

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    D 2 looks good for this site.
     
    kazi, Dec 16, 2009 IP
  6. MusicMeFree.com

    MusicMeFree.com Peon

    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Thank you for the feedback. On 1G I got rid of some text, but kept most of it because it helps my seo position for certain keywords. If I remove too much text my rankings might drop.
     
    MusicMeFree.com, Dec 17, 2009 IP
  7. jameshu

    jameshu Greenhorn

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    #7
    Actually, you can move the text to the bottom of the page, the place is SEO friendly.

     
    jameshu, Dec 17, 2009 IP
  8. netdriver788

    netdriver788 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,343
    Likes Received:
    74
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    158
    #8
    1G looks good in design and it is more comfortable.
     
    netdriver788, Dec 17, 2009 IP
  9. NoDepositer

    NoDepositer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    518
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    128
    #9
    1h i would say, but you need a new banner.
    Invest $5-$10 to get one here on DP.
     
    NoDepositer, Dec 17, 2009 IP
  10. MusicMeFree.com

    MusicMeFree.com Peon

    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Thank you for the feedback. I ended up combining some elements from 1h into 1G. For example, I used some of the header from 1h for 1G, and then published 1G as the new design for my website. I will see how that does.
     
    MusicMeFree.com, Dec 17, 2009 IP
  11. mikebpo

    mikebpo Active Member

    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #11
    i think 1 G is better but more good graphics or css will work
     
    mikebpo, Dec 17, 2009 IP
  12. CustomiZer

    CustomiZer Peon

    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    I like the second one more....
     
    CustomiZer, Dec 17, 2009 IP
  13. diazw

    diazw Member

    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    #13
    d2 is the one I would select
     
    diazw, Dec 23, 2009 IP
  14. gg0103

    gg0103 Peon

    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    design 1 is way too bright and not relaxing at all. rather uncomfortable on the eyes if you ask me.

    design 2 is the one to go with. the blue is more natural to ones eyes these days.loose the pink site.
     
    gg0103, Dec 23, 2009 IP
  15. superduper3

    superduper3 Active Member

    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #15
    deffo d2 one is well tooooo bright in your face blue is calm relaxed chilling makes you think of sea waves sky need i say more
     
    superduper3, Dec 24, 2009 IP
  16. TheJizzer

    TheJizzer Peon

    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #16


    I completely AGREE!
    You should choose the second!
    :)
     
    TheJizzer, Dec 27, 2009 IP
  17. 0k0

    0k0 Active Member

    Messages:
    144
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #17
    Between the two I would go with the first one. However the table with the products, in my opinion is too big, the image is not well set. May be you can divide the songs in two rows.
     
    0k0, Dec 27, 2009 IP
  18. travistay

    travistay Peon

    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    1H looks better but if you intend to monetize using adsense 1G is better due to the blue color theme.
     
    travistay, Dec 27, 2009 IP
  19. LetsGoViral

    LetsGoViral Greenhorn

    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    #19
    The second one looks colder but overall I think the design is better on the second one.
     
    LetsGoViral, Dec 27, 2009 IP
  20. Agon.C

    Agon.C Peon

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #20
    I think the blue one looks more cool and fresh, you can make it better if you make it more colorful and more textless. Try some different banner designs too...
     
    Agon.C, Dec 27, 2009 IP