Which type of mod rewrite is better?

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by aditya_sfs, Dec 30, 2006.

?

Which type of URL is better

  1. [url]http://www.sitename.com/page-title/[/url]

    2 vote(s)
    16.7%
  2. [url]http://www.sitename.com/page-title.html[/url]

    5 vote(s)
    41.7%
  3. Both have same value

    5 vote(s)
    41.7%
  1. #1
    aditya_sfs, Dec 30, 2006 IP
  2. Pedro Monteiro

    Pedro Monteiro Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,261
    Likes Received:
    47
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #2
    I would say that they hold the same value.

    I'll try to dig up some literature on the subject and will post it here.
     
    Pedro Monteiro, Dec 30, 2006 IP
  3. evera

    evera Peon

    Messages:
    283
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I don't know in terms of spiders and SEO, but "normal" users like pages with .html more imo.
     
    evera, Dec 31, 2006 IP
  4. Richie_Ni

    Richie_Ni Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    10,721
    Likes Received:
    1,175
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    410
    #4
    I prefer the .html ones.
     
    Richie_Ni, Dec 31, 2006 IP
  5. master06

    master06 Peon

    Messages:
    2,806
    Likes Received:
    121
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    i prefer too second options because search engines like html extension pages ;)
     
    master06, Dec 31, 2006 IP
  6. Wouter

    Wouter Peon

    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    I think both have the same value, the length of each url is the same so each keyword in both urls would get the same amount of 'relevance'.
     
    Wouter, Dec 31, 2006 IP
  7. tips

    tips Peon

    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #7
    I think they both have the same value. I would go with the former if you are rewriting dynamic pages. Include the trailing slash in your links to those pages.

    Just be sure not to change the URLs of existing pages without 301 redirecting the old URLs to the new URLs or you will lose search engine value on the site.
     
    tips, Dec 31, 2006 IP
    Pedro Monteiro likes this.
  8. Nick_Mayhem

    Nick_Mayhem Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,486
    Likes Received:
    338
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    290
    #8
    I also prefer the .html one. single level deep pages. :)
     
    Nick_Mayhem, Dec 31, 2006 IP
  9. Rickzkm

    Rickzkm Peon

    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    i prefer .html but it should be correctly done.
    If you have a product-category/ it should be a list of products (index.html) and direct product-category/name-of-a-product.html should be a detailed description. That's what i prefer.
     
    Rickzkm, Jan 1, 2007 IP
  10. netprophet

    netprophet Banned

    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    i prefer .html page instead of deep linking like in /folder/
     
    netprophet, Jan 2, 2007 IP