Hello, I know a xml sitemap looks like this: "http://www.yoursite.com/sitemap.xml" and adding .gz at the end is for your zipped compressed version. Okay, now I've heard the purpose for the compressed version is for search engines pretty much. But I don't see any million dollar sites or blogs using a compressed version for their robots.txt. They all use just their regular xml sitemap. Is there really any difference which one you use for your robots.txt? Is it okay to use "http://www.yoursite.com/sitemap.xml.gz" or should I just use the regular one? Thanks for any advice, I did search and search before I asked such a newb question. cheers!
if you are using a wordpress blog then need not worry about sitemaps or anything just promote your site and never mind about crawling if you add contents daily then after few months your contents will be indexed within hours i.e. spider will assume that your blog gets updated daily so it will visit often
If you have a "small" XML sitemap then don't worry about compression. When you get into the tens of thousands of links though, then start looking at it.
Appreciate it guys, thanks for the responses to my robots.txt question. I understand the difference between them now.
compressed sitemaps are for HUUUUUUUUUUUGE forums that have thousands of links webmasters compress their sitemaps so search engines dont eat up so much bandwidth robots.txt is never compressed, because it is never over 1KB in size
oh thanks for sharing nice information. from today i understand the difference between compressed sitemaps and robots.txt.
Hi Knight1, just to make you correct, I want to apprise you that your question was not related to robots.txt but it was about sitemap.xml.
Bottom line...dont worry about compressed sitemaps unless you run an HUGE forum or ecommerce site with 10,000+ products. Do you?