i voted both, and i think it is very helfull ecause i am really interested in what others take in mind before writing their article.
Just share your views please, this may be not helpful for you but could be helpful for someone like me. I have no desire to promote my signature this way. Thanks
You should always write for humans, if you write high quality content your keywords will appear naturally anyway, which is much more effective than keyword stuffed-robotic garbage.
I think first, you must write for humans. But in this world, you must also write for the search engines or humans will never see your glorious written words. You also need to incorporate resource boxes with a link to a free report when possible; this helps grow your opt-in list which is like the true "gold" of any Internet marketing effort. Great poll and good luck to all. Peace, love, happiness, and prosperity, Stephanie
Hi, I would vote for "Write for humans" since almost all hot article directories would have fiercer human confirmation nowadays. all the best,
If you want to get seo advantages from search engines like google,yahoo,bing then for both & if you want to simply give your knowledge to other's then oly for humans.
i've voted for both of them to what i have to think first in writing an article, though, for me, writing for humans is what i really think about.. i want my readers to enjoy and fully understand my articles.. i want it to be as a friendly-user article as it can be...
I write for humans only. Generally the only part that relates to my site is the link at the bottom or in the bio. So while I suppose this is for search engines, that's not really part of the writing process.
When I write something, I think about both SE and Humans. I think this the quality and skill of a good writer who can write content keeping both search engine and Humans in mind..