Yep. frenkie wasted no time in demonstrating his religious dishonesty and outright denial, even when the sources are presented directly to him. All he needs now is AGS to come in and cheer for him. I can't think of anything else missing, can you? We have: http://www.6thcolumnagainstjihad.com/PORTIA_P1.htm 1) Attempt to outwit 2) Demanding evidence (when the truth is already known) 3) Tactical denial when evidence is presented 4) Diversion 4 out of 8 isn't bad, for his first try
You dont support that "Israel must be wiped out"? I'm just re-confirming to avoid any confusion in futher discussion. Just answer in yes/no, nothing else. you just say - 'Yes, I do' Or 'No, I don't'
I dont know why your assuming that I do, mabye you support that israel wiped off the map so much that you are insisting other people are aswell? AS I already Said I dont support such a thing, as you put in my mouth that I did. You have problems Try Again.
I'm not missing that, it's been done already. http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=3835852&postcount=52 You have some serious problems in getting really simple questions. Perhaps that is because English is not your first language. Never mind, I'll try again Now read this very carefully and slowly. Do you support the statement - "Islamic nations will not let its historic enemy live in its heartland, Israel must be wiped off the map." Now answer the question with simple Yes, I do or No, I dont Thats' it. Try answering that.
You seem to lack initial understanding of English, if you had the ability to read my sentences correctly you would of understood that I do not support the idea that Israel should be wiped off the map, either way your so obsessed with it, seems like you do. Try Again.
Doh! Yeah, no surprise there! Apparently he doesn't understand that ahmadinejad wants Israel wiped off the map. Perhaps he thought ahmadinejad wants to send Jews a fruit basket and some chocolates instead? I'll never understand people that defend those who call for genocide.
What Ahmadinejad said was not a direct threat, it was more of an indirect threat and can be very well perceived as a serious threat. You seem to defend him so much, while it does not matter if that was this type of threat or that type of threat. He makes himself very clear saying these things, and any normal and sane with a basic educational level could easily understand what he meant BETWEEN the words. If you lack the ability to see that, i'm very sorry then, sucks for you.
From what i see here, he's just messing around. He probably wants to play the 'when did X say such things ? Why do you put words into X's mouth?' game. It's clearly understandable that Ahmadinejad wants a genocide, only problem is he can't make it a reality.
I'm not a muslim, just live in a Muslim country. But mabye he should of chose different words to say in public, but that is his beleif then let it be, sure Israel takes some flack from Hezbollah and Hamas, but Israel dishes out much more than they do to Israel, the ratio is something like 1 Israeli for 8 palestinian deaths, you have to see it from both sides. Like the genocide performed on the native americans?
Now you expressed the complete thought, it was tough though, wasn't it? Anyways ignore the above statement and read on, Since you do not support the idea, then you mean Iran's president made a wrong statement. Do you condemn him for making such statement filled with hatred? Again without much blaber, Just YES or No (that you missed last time)
I concur. This is quite popular here. I'm still having a hard time understanding why he would defend a man that has repeatedly called for Jewish genocide. If a Christian or Jew had made similar comments about muslims in the same manner, there would be riots, protests with signs that say "behead those that insult islam," torching embassies, burning buildings, killing others, destroying cars, calls for boycotts angry mobs of muslims would fill Yahoo's images. I guess it's something to do with that "peace and tolerance" thingy we always hear about I am part Native American Indian. Comanche to be exact. My forefathers fought my forefathers. Try again.
you need to rememeber the history, Yom Kippur War. Yom Kipur, also known as the 1973 Arab-Israeli War and the Fourth Arab-Israeli War, was fought from October 6 to October 26, 1973, between Israel and a coalition of Arab states led by Egypt and Syria. The war began with a surprise joint attack by Egypt and Syria on the Jewish holiday of Yom Kippur. The Egyptians and Syrians advanced during the first 24–48 hours, after which momentum began to swing in Israel's favor. By the second week of the war, the Syrians had been pushed entirely out of the Golan Heights. In the Sinai to the south, the Israelis struck at the "seam" between two invading Egyptian armies, crossed the Suez Canal (where the old ceasefire line had been), and cut off the Egyptian Third Army just as a United Nations cease-fire came into effect. Also in another war in 1967,Six-Day War, the Israelis had captured Egypt's Sinai Peninsula all the way up to the Suez Canal, which had become the cease-fire line, and roughly half of Syria's Golan Heights. So until now, Israel won all the wars.
There have been really interesting facts in this thread, I hope this war never happen and all issues are sorted out through talks if there are any , personally i think israel has more weapons, more power and more support so i think if there goes a war israel would win. Personally i am not bothered but if i bother than my sympathies would be with weaker party and i shall speak for them . I think Gtech is on a mission which has a code name "Mission Rant" and his statements are annoying me. There are other people in this thread who have posted nice stats but oh Gtech please become a human think from some thing in between your ears and live by some thing in between your ribs. I expect a rant and may be an infraction.
LOL. All the conventional missiles, tanks, etc that Israel has are all paid and maintained by the US.
Not all.. but yeah some of them.. But is that bad? is US selling Weapons to other countries bad? Do you see anything wrong with it?