Which is better .html or .htm?

Hi
It doesnt matter so much but I would recommed .html
I feel its habitual now for .html

 

Thank you all for giving precious suggestions and comments.

 

Is only one diff:

99% from visitors and "critics" likes .html links. a lot of ppls "looks strange" sometimes htm, php, asp links

 

Which is precisely what I was going to say myself.

For larger websites, this option can take a lot of setting up, but from an SEO point of view, it's a fantastic choice...

 

no difference at all mate. its simly down to the preference of the webmaster really.

 

.html is better because it is more specific.

 

Hi,
I think there is no difference between .htm and .html
While comparing to .htm,.html is more descriptive.But when considering Noddegamra's post ,I thought .html is better choice.

Good luck!!!!!!!

 

file extensions doesnt matter at all...

 

I would choose HTML, the majority use it and as someone mentioned it is more descriptive.

 

I thought .html extension was better for SEO? .

 

hi

i have suggest the .htm extension is better

 

I think you use .htm

 

This will clear up everything:

http://www.sightspecific.com/~mosh/WWW_FAQ/ext.html

SEO Wise, No effect at ALL..!

 

no difference SEO wise

 

It really doesn't matter, but this is a good post. I think there are some who also wonders.

 

Agree with the others that there's no difference between .htm and .html. They just have different formats

 

there is no difference for both of them.

.html and .htm is the same for seo

 

You don't need to worry about it. No difference is there in .htm and html

 

there are no difference. both are same

 

classically, when saving a file it only allows 3 characters as for extension!
.htm works and now .html works too!