Very true indeed. But hey, can't help it due to the constant bombardment of everyday biased media channels.
Seldom is there indeed a matter that is impartial. The only thing you can do is read a lot of claims, consider the agreement, and then make your own decisions. Anyone who appears to be impartial — hint-hint, New York Times — essentially claims to be correct or to know the "truth" purely under the presumption that they are "impartial," which is no different from those who pretend to know the truth even though they are impartial. No factual reality remains. Only commonly accepted and proven truths are present that will ultimately become facts. And though, simply because something is mainstream doesn't always mean it's valid, since scientific progress has proved time and time again that even the most accepted hypotheses can be incorrect. It's best if you don't pretend to be authoritative, accept that basically every point is arbitrary and just simply prove what you think is right.
Well everycountry now boasts their own news and gets affiliated to one party or particular views. If you want world news specifically you need to follow their country top ( left and right) channel, otherwise you will end up like being at the end of either CNN or FOX. web made this world complex and easy