In the future, we will get spy technology that can keep track on everyone on this planet. Every move each human make and every deep thought each human make will be put in an open registry database where the police department and government officials will be able to look in. Therefore we will not need a court system since everything will be obvious. The police comes and pick you, wherever you are on this planet. But when? My guess is somewhere between 2030 and 2050.
Well, if that ever happens, you are way off. Unless you consider the world the country in which you live. Take a peak around the planet and you will see just how hard it would be to complete your slippery slope idea. We still can't find Bin Laden, so I would say that being able to track EVERYONE on the planet is way off. Now, what you might have is the tracking of most people in the first world, because of tracking implants, which are on the way. It will be some time though. The first implants will be children, because parents will view it as a safety measure. Expect implanting of children to start on a fair decent scale in the next decade. Two to four decades after that, it will become more mainstream and accepted. By 2100 it is possible that most people in the first world will be trackable. However, the war with China is coming within 40-50 years from now so we will have to see who survives.
It will be the world after NWO is formed Why only children? Why not adults too? How are you so sure that US are going to war with them? Why not now when they are weak?
1. What is the NWO--specifically. Aside from being a catch-phrase that's been in use for around 20+ years that is. 2. It has to start somewhere. It will start with parents implanting children. Eventually, those children will grow up and have children and do the same. At that point, there will be a large population of adults in the first world. 3. It's too long to post here. Basically, it's a theory based on political science research. Also, what makes you think that China is weak?
For me, it is when the all the world, basically has the same leadership. For others, it's also a fascist world-leadership. Maybe you're right. They might however secretly add a mind control feature wich will prevent any extreme/abnormal thinking. The advertising slogan can be somewhat like this: Worried about your kids? Use this chip to know what they do. I would like to have some links atleast because I am very interested. I think that US is far more powerfull than China today. This may however change within 10-20 years. Why didn't you started the war in 1991 to get it done instead of feeding the devil even more?
Everyone? Wow. What political science scholars predicted this event? I would love to read what the basis of their hypothesis was. Also what type of war was predicted?
Wait a minute.. Japan don't have a real army or even nukes?? Anyway, Japan is declining very fast, both in population and in economics. Birth rate is way too low, what happened?
Ok, well that is quite some time off--if ever. A world government is not likely to be in the cards unless the Hegemonic state of the period has superior militaristic and economic capabilities and it's allies follow. While the U.S. is the current hegemonic nation-state, we do not posses this capability (even at our height, which has passed). We have done a lot to pass along our doctrine though (UN, IMF, etc). The politics of the world simply don't lend credit to the thought of one world government--something idealists hope happen to strengthen their deteriorated view. As to China, according to indicators such as COW, they are rising (along with India), while the U.S. is leveling off. It will most likely be another 30-40 years before China and the U.S. become equal. China has begun to steal away low paying jobs from Mexico as they have a greater ability (through governmental pressure) to provide high quantities of the cheapest labor. Their move to open up to capitalism in the past couple of decades has certainly helped to facilitate their change and rise on the world's power chart. On indicator of their arrival as a legitimate challenger will most likely be the re-capture of Taiwan. Also in three to four decades China will have a substantial hold on oil exports due to all the long-term contracts they have been forging. It's possible that crude oil will start becoming scarce around that point, in which case, China will be holding some valuable "cards".
They have a security force. It's not designed for heavy offensive actions. The reason why Japan has not militarized since WWII is two fold: 1. The people of Japan are against it. Remember, they had two atomic bombs dropped on them due to their imperialist actions in WWII. 2. The USA-Japan Security Treaty. We (USA) have a asymmetrical treaty and bilateral alliance with Japan, whereby, the U.S. will come to the aid of Japan if it's attacked. We maintain about 60,000 troops there and in return, Japan pays for roughly half of the maintenance cost. That's why I wanted to know what "political science" scholar(s) predicted this, to what extent and what the specifics were. We have no reason to attack Japan in a militaristic fashion (breaking our treaty doing it) and Japan lacks the capability to do so. Also Japan is a country without natural resources. This is why they use "checkbook diplomacy" to get the job done. If we have any "war" with Japan, it is the continued political and economic skirmishes that go on between all states on a daily basis.
Our court system has been out of date for quite some time. I think it should be replaced by something new as soon as possible.
The single worst thing in our courts today: Lifetime appointments. It is kind of ironic that we would take away accountability in the very place that's there to create and enforce it.
LOL.. I'm not guilty but it's a long time for all innocents to wait and enough time for a criminal to flee the country.
I think technically it would be possible to implant a chip in everyone's hand/head/butt/whatever today, so the technology is already here. The only problem is acceptance. People have to be mentally prepared for this idea first. It surely doesn't do anything for freedoms - if the government tried to implement it now, we might get an uprising. What I don't understand is why you guys are linking it to the court system? The purpose of the court is interpret the laws, how does tracking make the need to interpret laws obsolete?
If we know every move and every thoughts of everyone on the planet, we know exactly when someone is going to do a crime, therefore we can prevent the crime before it happens or directly punish the guy after it happens. By increasing violence in the news, people might get more concererned about their own security(the violence in the news had been increased 6 times in the latest years according to Michael More). This chip will help them to protect themselves. They can also include other functions which makes the consumers health better(higher IQ, anti-depressive and such, nobody wants to miss such chance). Also the ability to look after your kids, which many concerned parents wants to do.