When Is Less, More? (smaller AdSense format = better CTR?)

Discussion in 'Placement / Reviews / Examples' started by Surf_Dude, Jul 18, 2006.

0
  1. #1
    Lately, I've noticed some discussion of an apparent developing aversion to large AdSense ads. Such as the well-respected, Google-touted-#1, heavily used (me too), top-of-the-page, 336x280 ad size.
    Words mentioned - "first thing in-your-face", "unprofessional look", "MFA", "spaminess", "turn-off", etc. Could the standard be changing?

    My question:
    Have you ever experienced better CTR, after you replaced a "biggie" with a smaller-sized ad format? If so, what was the large size you were using, and what was the smaller size you switched over to (assuming same placement and colors, etc.).

    Thank you for any responses. I think I want to try this.
    .
     
    Surf_Dude, Jul 18, 2006 IP
  2. jquindlen

    jquindlen Notable Member

    Messages:
    1,725
    Likes Received:
    112
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    220
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #2
    I noticed a 50% decrease in CTR when I replaced one of my larger ads with a smaller one.
     
    jquindlen, Jul 18, 2006 IP
  3. Surf_Dude

    Surf_Dude Peon

    Messages:
    955
    Likes Received:
    62
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    50% is huge. One big vote against the smaller ads.

    I was thinking of going from a 336 to either a medium rectangle or square.
     
    Surf_Dude, Jul 18, 2006 IP
  4. rocco siffredi

    rocco siffredi Peon

    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    in one of my sites i started with only 1 leaderboard 728x90 below the top logo and menu.

    CTR was 1-1.5%

    then i added 1 skyscraper and 2 link units, CTR remained more or less the same but the pay out decreased 20-30% !
     
    rocco siffredi, Jul 19, 2006 IP