What's worse?

Discussion in 'Google' started by Ulquiorra, Jan 21, 2009.

?

Which is worse, PR 9 sites gone or PR <= 2 sites gone?

  1. All PR 9 sites gone would be worse

    3 vote(s)
    42.9%

  2. All PR <= 2 sites gone would be worse

    4 vote(s)
    57.1%
0
  1. #1
    What would be worse?

    All pagerank 9 pages disappearing off the internet, or all page rank <=2 pages disappearing?
     
    Ulquiorra, Jan 21, 2009 IP
  2. domainbiz

    domainbiz Peon

    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    All Pagerank 9s gone would be BAD! We need high pr sites like them on the internet :D to maintain stability!
     
    domainbiz, Jan 21, 2009 IP
  3. rehash

    rehash Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,502
    Likes Received:
    30
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    150
    #3
    PR9 are so few that they are disposable, while <=PR2 are a huge % of the internet
    Actually all sites and subpages created this month are <=PR2
     
    rehash, Jan 22, 2009 IP
  4. jonbuoy

    jonbuoy Peon

    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    IMHO the greatest use of the internet is to research and exchange knowledge in less well known topics that might be of interest to only a few dozen folk worldwide. If the websites for these topics disappeared, the internet would be a worse place.

    If the PR9 sites disappeared, it would be inconvenient, but the information would still be available elsewhere.
     
    jonbuoy, Jan 22, 2009 IP
  5. Flesch

    Flesch Peon

    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    Of course PR2..
    Without them you no small quality sites.
    PR3 begins to get into bigger sites..

    If Google is PR9 then we have a problem.. =]
    Maybe nyt.com too..
     
    Flesch, Jan 22, 2009 IP
  6. dmi

    dmi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    51
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #6
    The first choice.
     
    dmi, Jan 22, 2009 IP
  7. Giamatti

    Giamatti Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,319
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    148
    #7
    PR 9 sites should stay, they provide valuable information that (most) PR2 sites dont provide.
     
    Giamatti, Jan 22, 2009 IP
  8. lycos

    lycos Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,769
    Likes Received:
    176
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    185
    #8
    I don't know how you want to compare. But for me, it's equally bad :)
     
    lycos, Jan 22, 2009 IP
  9. jrp1

    jrp1 Active Member

    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #9
    Seeing as there's just over 50 PR9 sites and millions of >PR2 sites, I think it would be worse if the >PR2 sites were to vanish. Alot of blogs and personal pages would disappear. I'd like to say that 90% of the internet is PR2 or less. If they were to disappear, the Internet would seem pretty empty.
     
    jrp1, Jan 22, 2009 IP