Just wondering if anyone here knows if Google has provided any guidelines or any limits concerning the maximum number of sites that a publisher can put adsense. Has anyone had any issues of this type with Google before.
I don't think there is a limit, as long as they are adhere to the normal quality guidelines for sites.
You can setup as many channels you want - not only 200. But you have to toggle active to inactive as the limit for active ch is only 200 as Matt said. In overall all your sites/pages having AS code with your pub ID will be tracked and added to the report. And there is *NO* maximum limit as of now.
Sky is the limit with AdSense. Now who is going to ask - What is the maximum $$ that we can earn with adsense?
I was thinking that the inactive channels would not track stats. Are you saying that they continue to track stats while they are inactive? That would be cool.
Matt, Sorry - It wont do that way. When a channel is inactive - IT IS INACTIVE & it wont track while it is inactive. Sorry again if I was misleading earlier.
There is no limit to the number of sites or pages on which you can place AdSense. Our crawlers will automatically detect each of your URLs and begin serving relevant ads.
Hi ASA, Just one question while you're here if you don't mind: (I banged on a lot about this when I first came here as it was forthright in my mind.. it's now slipped back, but it's still there..niggling) What do Google define as Built for AdSense? I'd just like a little clarification before investing capital and expanding my 'enterprises', so to speak. It seems a very gray and ambiguous clause in what would otherwise be a solid, for-sure-no-doubt-about-it policy. I'm sure it would help many others feel a little more easy about what essentially the majority of publishers here are doing. It's always in the back of my mind, personally, even though I know my sites contain original content contracted by authors and DO hold value to my target audience. Could it be the look, AdSense placement for example, or is it mainly content, or lack of content that the term applies to? It really is very, very gray. Personally with it being such an ambiguous clause I feel it needs clarifying in the actual policy document itself. I'd be happy if you passed on my thoughts to the AdSense team about this. It could drive a man insane thinking about it. Well, if they're anything like me! Note to others: The usual suspects who moan on at me when I bring this up and slap reds on me - I couldn't careless my friends, it's an issue I feel needs addressing and I'm sure many others do, too. Cheers, Pete