What's better? (PR related)

Discussion in 'Search Engine Optimization' started by mcmuney, May 22, 2008.

  1. #1
    Is it better to have a backlink on an inner page with no PR of a high PR site OR to be on an inner page with PR rating?

    For example: Site A.com has a PR4 rating and site B.com has PR2. You can get a backlink on A.com/A/ that's PR0 OR B.com/B/ that's PR2, which is better and why?
     
    mcmuney, May 22, 2008 IP
  2. rcj662

    rcj662 Guest

    Messages:
    4,403
    Likes Received:
    97
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    One page that has pr is best. Some inner pages never have any pr
     
    rcj662, May 22, 2008 IP
  3. daryo

    daryo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,343
    Likes Received:
    46
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #3
    It's the best if you have backlink on a PR page :)
     
    daryo, May 22, 2008 IP
  4. godsofchaos

    godsofchaos Peon

    Messages:
    2,595
    Likes Received:
    124
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I'll say think of the future, a high pr site usually gets a good pr in all its pages. If it doesn't have a pr in a post now, thats because the post is newer than the last update of pr and will be considered higher than pr2 when google updates pr again. :)
     
    godsofchaos, May 22, 2008 IP
  5. mcmuney

    mcmuney Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    834
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    128
    #5
    I would expect that a high PR site would also have PR on most inner pages, but I'm finding that not to be true in many cases. I have a few PR2 directories where most of the inner/category pages are also PR2. But I'm noticing that many PR5 directories have very few or non inner rated pages. And I'm not referring to new sites, a few of the sites that I've monitored regular has had PR5 over a year.
     
    mcmuney, May 22, 2008 IP
  6. Darkness

    Darkness Peon

    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Go for the one with the better PR.
     
    Darkness, May 22, 2008 IP
  7. umar.daraz

    umar.daraz Active Member

    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    #7
    Get link from a pr page.

    Thanks and Regards,
    Umar :)
     
    umar.daraz, May 22, 2008 IP
  8. sheds

    sheds Peon

    Messages:
    825
    Likes Received:
    9
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    It's always good practice to build back links for internal pages, also...
    As earlier rcj662 said,
    some internal pages do not have any pr.. he is right,,,
    Cz if you have more than 2k pages on your website, it's not possible for google to distribute PR to each and every pages...
     
    sheds, May 22, 2008 IP
  9. everythingisplanned

    everythingisplanned Peon

    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    it is good if ur have inner page pr
     
    everythingisplanned, May 22, 2008 IP
  10. mixke

    mixke Prominent Member

    Messages:
    5,917
    Likes Received:
    590
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #10
    It'll be better to have a link on the page with PR if you're only looking to improve the PR. However, there are a 'number of factors' to be considered other than the page's PR.
     
    mixke, May 22, 2008 IP
  11. aira

    aira Active Member

    Messages:
    1,175
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #11
    The page that is more relevant to your site regardless of their PR is the best link for your site IMO
     
    aira, May 23, 2008 IP
  12. AddSense

    AddSense Peon

    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    If this is really PR0 (not N/A) you may choose PR0 link if domain that links to your site is old enough. You'll get some trust rank from such link.
     
    AddSense, May 23, 2008 IP