Though i have scrapebox,bmd,lfe,but i think all of them not good software to get baclinks, if you want to get high quality backlinks,you should do it by yourself,manual.
Check out BuildingLinkService.net - They create permanent indexed backlinks for you to help increase your SEO for only $10 a month.
But you still can use software that helps you check links still there, if you do link exchange for example, or buy links on monthly basis.
Manual link building is so tedious - I know it *might* pay off in the long run, but the guys out there making the money are not sitting there manually posting on blogs and submitting articles to sites.
Build links manually and choose high page ranking article sites such as ezine articles, isnare and go articles to link from. Using submission software is just asking for trouble and complete waste of time.
I usually do it manually , and have never tried any automatic software. But i am looking for soothing like that. But as of my knowledge automatic back links are not good as all the best SEO expert don't use automatic software but they like to it manually.
Software generally use Link Farms and other Black HAT SEO methods to generate backlinks. That's why these are not recommended. Your website might get blacklisted if you use Black Hat SEO methods. The best option is MANUAL BACKLINKING .
I agree..building links manually is much more productive, trying to build links quickly with software will only end up with your site linked to thousands of sites with 0 authority. Best method is to choose high ranking site to link from offering good content, its not all about the amount of links you have, its more about quality.
Manually link building is far too time consuminig and has very little ROI. maybe Perhaps Google likes it, but unless you want to slave for links all day, forget it!
try using the free wordpress plugin from bloggerhigh.com - it gets you free one way backlinks automatically (obviously need a wordpress blog).
Why would it look like spam? It makes no difference whether you use a piece of software like submiteaze or a web browser to submit. In case you haven't noticed, a web browser *is* a piece of software; it sends messages over an HTTP connection, just like a piece of submission software does. The directory sat at the other end of the wire doesn't know what has sent those messages. If you think it makes a blind bit of difference to submit using a web browser over using submission software then you're mistaken. It makes no difference. The big difference is that you spend hours submitting using a web browser, I spend a couple of minutes setting it up and then press one button. You'll notice that *everyone* who says 'manual is best' has no valid reason of *why* manual is best. Why? Because there is no valid reason, it makes no difference.
I don't think using software is a waste of time, actually in some cases just the opposite. A program like Scrapebox for example, I would not use it to blast thousands of spammy comments, but is an amazing link scraper, you can use it to find good quality links, then manually you go on each, read the page and post a good useful comment on it. Done this way the software can save you hours in harvesting links...
Manual is best, just think about creating quality and relevancy when it comes to link building. Google is evolving to discredit spammed links from automatic software, so what the point. Yes manually building links is boring and writing unique relevant content is hard work but, do things properly and you will have the last laugh!