fgogo merely wanted to debunk the "Content is King" myth by showing a half-baked example of searching "make money online" through logged-in search (check his link (https://) and claimed that a certain free hosted blog has ranked at the top of the searches by means of building spammy backlinks to it. ...... A couple of posts later, no one can see the blog anymore since it was poor enough to even rank in the first 10 pages for having poor content. Backlinks is KING!
Grimm There been no content from begining. There been only links. So, why You beautyfull websites with king content been at end of ranking ? Answers is sooo easy: CONTENT IS KING - this is fairytale Good link building is always a winner
You can't even properly define what is a good website. You can't even see the bigger picture as you only see the short-term effects of SEO in general. You also remind me of them SEO companies who promise top positions in Google for competitive keywords. Not all websites in the web are e-commerce websites. Are you saying that if you have an e-commerce website, you shouldn't do any content and just build them links? Is that what proper SEO to you? If you have a large e-commerce website, surely you would create a title for each, right? If you can create 100,000 titles for each type of product, why can't you create a simple informative description for each? If you were selling bike parts, surely you would describe which part of the bike it is and what does it do, right? Also, you even haven't answered my question. Answer mine first and I will explain mine. SEOers tend to discuss logically and not defend itself by saying "you're a beginner or you're a noob". I never claimed that I'm an expert SEO but a dose of common sense can make SEO easier to understand. Oh I pretty much understand proper SEO, thank you Would you care to tell me why Wikipedia ranks for most of the generic terms? Is it because of backlinks or because of the content? I don't play SEO. I study it. Why so defensive SEO master? LOL
Surely you can do better than that. You can't even defend the example you have provided on your first post. The beginning is almost 10 years ago. Have you been reading the news? or were you thinking that Google's algorithm hasn't changed over the past years?
If you would like to have a good income from SEO, you can't study it, you need to have a effect. Do you study at digitalpoint ? I easy see that you wrote over 3K posts and still believe in fairytale. In this way, your life will be too short to get simple phrase top ranked, but of course You can do as you like. At google result arena is few groups of SEO trades. #1 Spamers, who making milions of MFA pages and using spam link building. This group still go up and down, but there so easy to create next page, and good spammers have 6 figure income #2 Business pages, i'm in this group. Here you cant allow that client website can go down, you cant make here 301 redirect, because sometimes clients spend just for domain several thousands $$. You need to be really good and responsible, Your work need to bring a effect. #3 Bloggers and other small website owners, who believe in content. This group is top ranked only where no competitors with quality link building. So, You never win with first two groups in popular phrases. You using definition PROPER SEO. I will tell You what it meaning for me. If you have two similar websites, and CANT say which using factitious link building - This is proper SEO and the best possible way which bring effect. In this way Google can't penalize site, because there not visible any bad signal to do it. Client happy and me too. This is my rule. My game. MY SEO. I love it !
Only relevant topics please. My post count or anybody else is completely irrelevant to this matter. I apologise for saying this but you are so dense and you lack a great deal of common sense. Blah blah blah. I never asked for that and you still keep on avoiding my questions. Answer them please if you can Thank you. This? Your definition of SEO? I can't even understand any of it! Can we please use a more 'understandable' language, please? Too much gibberish. Your arguments have become totally irrelevant at this point. Ethical SEO is what we're talking about and not your spammy ways of making money. It's people like you that manipulates the search engines just to make loads of money. If you really want a proper SEO conversation, be rational (if you can). There's a difference between an SEO specialist and a Link Builder P.S. Your rules and your game? What have you been smoking?
I was also thinking that hubpages and squidoo have millions pages with content and there are many more web 2.0 sites and blogs like that. How can Google check this much content?
Grimm Sorry, but i have no time like you to dreaming and writing 3K posts or explain to you easy and clean things. You can study and believe in fairytales as you did before, anyway wish You luck with your dream. Under my control is close to 100 websites, where I'm decide about seo strategy. All of them is top ranked and not been affected by panda and right now by penguin. For sure you have no one page top ranked with your knowledge about seo, and it not will change for next 3K posts / 4 years. Thats all what i would like to say for you. Stay in your dream.
LOL. So defensive and hostile. Good luck with your websites "so-called-SEO-master". I've met a lot of guys like you and you never fail to give a good laugh. If you don't wish to engage in a proper discussion then fine, it's okay to surrender rather than further humiliating yourself. Good call, chap
human have taste - and quality content for one can be crape for another person - how does a robot understand this ?