What is the best way to list sites on a Directory by default?

Discussion in 'Directories' started by ! Ask !, Nov 2, 2006.

?

What is the best way to list sites on a Directory by default?

  1. Page Rank

    58.8%
  2. Alphabetic

    11.8%
  3. Hits

    11.8%
  4. Data Added

    11.8%
  5. Random

    5.9%
  6. Other

    8.8%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. onlinedude

    onlinedude Peon

    Messages:
    1,193
    Likes Received:
    322
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    I think, technically speaking, alphabetic makes the most sense. A directory is supposed to be a reference catalog of websites. Most reference works are sorted alphabetically.
     
    onlinedude, Nov 3, 2006 IP
  2. ! Ask !

    ! Ask ! Peon

    Messages:
    3,282
    Likes Received:
    260
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Alphabetic makes sense the problem is that sites starting with “A” get and advantage, but that also happens on all other regular off-line listings.
     
    ! Ask !, Nov 4, 2006 IP
  3. tdz

    tdz Peon

    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    My directory is ordered by date. So my vote is Date Added.
     
    tdz, Nov 4, 2006 IP
  4. Blogmaster

    Blogmaster Blood Type Dating Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    25,924
    Likes Received:
    1,354
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    380
    #24
    PR unless you have a popularity voting system set up
     
    Blogmaster, Nov 4, 2006 IP
  5. onlinedude

    onlinedude Peon

    Messages:
    1,193
    Likes Received:
    322
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    Heh, yes. That's perhaps one reason why the name of a lot of directories begin with the letter "A."
     
    onlinedude, Nov 4, 2006 IP
  6. Blogmaster

    Blogmaster Blood Type Dating Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    25,924
    Likes Received:
    1,354
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    380
    #26
    Yeah, or it explains some of the great urls such as
    0-great-value-directory.info ;)
     
    Blogmaster, Nov 4, 2006 IP
  7. EveryQuery

    EveryQuery Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,039
    Likes Received:
    366
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #27
    The one option I would suggest NEVER to use is alphabetical. If you list alphabetically, then you will be constantly spammed with crazy looking titles who are simply trying to out-alphabetize the next guy. I personally like hits, but PR sorting is not bad either.
     
    EveryQuery, Nov 4, 2006 IP
  8. YMC

    YMC Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,787
    Likes Received:
    404
    Best Answers:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #28
    I've seen alphabetical work fairly well when the site name must be used. For the most part folks with names like 0-directory blah blah are going to have spammy sites that won't pass a professional directory owner's scrutiny.

    PR only works if the directory owner keeps it current. When my hard work finally gets rewarded and G gives my site the PR it deserves - my original PR0 listing really sucks.

    My site is in order by submission - oldest sites first. Why shouldn't the people who submitted early when traffic and PR was low get something for their early participation? Latecomers can always buy featured placement and I, as the site owner, need to keep adding/moving things around so that one category doesn't have 500 submissions and another 5.
     
    YMC, Nov 5, 2006 IP