What is Google's Main Objecive?

Discussion in 'Google' started by drionix, Feb 8, 2007.

  1. wibr

    wibr Peon

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    Google's objective?

    Scrap/index everyone else's websites, files, movies, etc...
    Store those websites/info in their databases
    Use those stored websites/info to make money from visitors (adsense, adwords, etc.)

    Pretty simple. And it works.

    After that they'll continue to buy out smaller competitors in different web oriented fields (such as Youtube) or anyone that does something new and cool on the web.

    Eventually they'll get fat, lazy, and arrogant. Someone younger and hungrier will come along and do everything better. And then google will either fold or they'll get hungry again.
     
    wibr, Feb 8, 2007 IP
  2. drionix

    drionix Peon

    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #22
    Hmm... what a very perceptive argument :D
     
    drionix, Feb 9, 2007 IP
  3. Pat Gael

    Pat Gael Banned

    Messages:
    1,331
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    Google is just the Microsoft's monopoly-like of the 21st. century so everything is reduced to money and power.
     
    Pat Gael, Feb 9, 2007 IP
  4. sh.lolz

    sh.lolz Peon

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    The difference is that Google's services are free.
     
    sh.lolz, Feb 9, 2007 IP
  5. Pat Gael

    Pat Gael Banned

    Messages:
    1,331
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #25
    That is true and really impressive :)
     
    Pat Gael, Feb 9, 2007 IP
  6. Tearabite

    Tearabite Prominent Member

    Messages:
    4,629
    Likes Received:
    429
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
    #26
    Tearabite, Feb 9, 2007 IP
  7. drionix

    drionix Peon

    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    Yeah, and let us hope it stays that way. It would be really disappointing if they start charging for everything just like Microsoft. :D
     
    drionix, Feb 9, 2007 IP
  8. guidyy

    guidyy Active Member

    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #28
    The next step from G is to buy all the mental health hospitals worldwide where to cure all the webmasters with nervous breakdown because of pagerank and SERP ......
    Aha! This one wont be a free service .....
     
    guidyy, Feb 9, 2007 IP
  9. John.

    John. Active Member

    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #29
    Go look at Googles NET profits for the past few years and see if their income is big enough to cover all that expenditure!!

    If you're not bothered.... quick answer YES. they are well able to cover all those costs. And as explained above the majority of those free services are not being run at a loss at all as they make a handsome profit from placing little ads here and there for all the millions of users that may wish to click on them.
     
    John., Feb 10, 2007 IP
  10. socialhuman

    socialhuman Peon

    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #30
    Google does business as business should be done.

    It is increasingly successful in providing its customers what they want - less spammy search results, services like Gmail, Picasa, and many others. And the customers pour in (billions)

    And then Google caters to another group of customers, businesspersons who want to sell something to these billions. And AdWords and AdSense puts the marketing messages just in front of those who are searching for something related to each product or service advertised. And sales pour in. Bringing business customers (in millions, if not yet in billions).

    Excellent business.

    By the way, do you remember the days before AdSense? Were you able to make any money through affiliate programs where the merchant insisted that someone clicking through your link buy "then and there" for you to get any commission for the clickthrough?

    Were you happier then than with AdSense?

    Unfortunately, the black hats entered the AdSense scene also, causing advertisers increasingly opt out of showing their ads on AdSense sites, and bringing our incomes crashing down...
     
    socialhuman, Feb 10, 2007 IP
  11. adnan

    adnan Peon

    Messages:
    1,614
    Likes Received:
    82
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #31
    Actually i think stockholders are happy with google.

    Btw, that is where they get the money for the free services which they provide.

    By stock.

    And they have quite a few sources of revenue.

    1)Adwords, very big source.

    2)Institutional Search, like Google Mini etc

    3)Google Earth

    4)Google Checkout, Paypal's new competitor.

    There probably are more.

    With it's free services, like google analytics or gmail.

    Well gmail it makes up by the adword ads which run on gmail.

    Analytics, it sees trends, can monitor browsing behaviour, can see the depth of search terms, for its competitors as well.

    So even though analytics is free for you, it is also a tool of gathering information for google.
     
    adnan, Feb 10, 2007 IP
  12. drionix

    drionix Peon

    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #32
    I heard of Google Mini before, but I thought that was still in Beta Phase. :p

    What you have said is true, but somehow I cannot tie-it-up with the over luxurious working environment they have in Google. Well, it may not be that "over luxurious" but compared to Microsoft (who's monitizing every product & services they have), Google still offers a very good environment for their workers. And that must cost them a relatively high Operational Cost. :confused:
     
    drionix, Feb 12, 2007 IP