Hi guys. Im wondering what is better for SEO: a)Nofollow backlink from high PR like Wikipedia or b)dofollow backlink from pr 1-3 Website
You are confused Wowcast, You are doing mixup to tow different things. 1) If you general asking then my answer is do-follow links of any pr blog is always better. 2)But if you compare do follow link with wikipedia then i tell you wikipedia is better. 3)but if you are asking SERP based then do follow link is better for SEO. Now you candeside what are you want doing
no follow has no link juice. So what's the point of having no follow from pr 10 site or even PR 11. But regarding with your example, wikipedia has lots of visitors and your link can be a source of good traffic regardless of link juice and that will do the job in comparing two ends.
Ok thanks for the infos... because i have heard that google gives some "points" to nofollow...not as many as for dofollow...
A single nofollow link from Wikipedia will probably give you more traffic than several dofollow links though.
for getting ur keywords in sero go for do follow links . But u need visits only not bothering about serp thn go for no follow
I prefer to get dofollow links from low PR sites than getting nofollow links from high PR sites. Anyway I cannot say nofollow from high PR site is worthless, I hope Google give some value to this link if it is from relevant same niche site. Atleast it can bring some traffic to our website.
Dofollow is best than nofollow high Pr, because it have more benefits to promote to their website in compare of nofollow high PR link.