What is better for Google PR, CMS or static ?

Discussion in 'Google' started by bnandika, Jun 24, 2007.

0
  1. #1
    I am a bit confused what is better for Google Page Rank, if we make the website as a static html or as Content Management System


    Thanks,
    Buddy
     
    bnandika, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  2. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #2
    It makes absolutely no difference. only backlinks effect PR.
     
    stOx, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  3. cheapdomains

    cheapdomains Banned

    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    only back links with high page rank.
     
    cheapdomains, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  4. SticKer

    SticKer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,393
    Likes Received:
    78
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    115
    #4
    get some quality backlinks and boost your pr
     
    SticKer, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  5. kh7

    kh7 Peon

    Messages:
    2,715
    Likes Received:
    109
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    You can have a CMS that creates normal (and stable) URL's. It's called URL-rewrite. Do that and you get the benefits of a CMS and the benefits of hardcoded sites. Good blogs do this all the time.
     
    kh7, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  6. Greg Carnegie

    Greg Carnegie Peon

    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    Google prefers: domain.com/category/subacategory/link.html over domain.com/index.php?action=category&action2=sub&sid=654jkhk54hnbmnb34 so like was said before consider URL rewriting because creating website in html only will take you a loooot of time.
     
    Greg Carnegie, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  7. trichnosis

    trichnosis Prominent Member

    Messages:
    13,785
    Likes Received:
    333
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    300
    #7
    i'm giving the answer . backlink is the better:D . the examples that you give has no effect on pr
     
    trichnosis, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  8. stOx

    stOx Notable Member

    Messages:
    6,426
    Likes Received:
    130
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    230
    #8
    Google doesn't spider or rank dynamic pages any differently that static pages.
     
    stOx, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  9. sparksflying

    sparksflying Peon

    Messages:
    1,066
    Likes Received:
    50
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    With regard to CMS vs Static , ive used both.
    When you go the road of a CMS ( like Joomla..) you can automate sitemap creation , turn on URL rewrites to nice URLS like explained above and automate things like tags,cloud pages and meta tags ( Title & Description..)

    Whereas with static pages , you have to spend more time on things manually...

    BUT! With this in mind , this only makes things a little easier.. I totally agree with everyone above.. Backlinks are major to getting great SERPS..

    And remember , Unique content is key!
     
    sparksflying, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  10. sundaybrew

    sundaybrew Numerati

    Messages:
    7,294
    Likes Received:
    1,260
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    560
    #10

    Wrong     , In fact Its easier for them to crawl dynamic pages

    Less tables...as most dynamic site are all positioned with css now

    and makes no difference in seo for either
     
    sundaybrew, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  11. gibex

    gibex Active Member

    Messages:
    1,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    95
    #11
    no different dynamic/static. just provide good info & optimized
     
    gibex, Jun 24, 2007 IP
  12. bnandika

    bnandika Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,079
    Likes Received:
    48
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #12
    Thanks for the reply, very helpful :)
     
    bnandika, Jun 25, 2007 IP