Yes, the terrorists were Islamic. We all know that, but that's not what made them terrorists. Every group has their extremists: Liberals have people who are against vaccinations, there are some black people who are in gangs, there are Christians in the KKK. Why do you associate every person who claims islam as a terrorist? Why do some people think that because someone is black that they are a hoodlum or that a libertarian is a weird non-vaccinated tree hugger? This sounds like a major lover of stereotypes. Plus, Islam does not preach violence, it is actually against it. These people who you call "terrorist" are so far from what the religion really is about that they really are just a hate group. What would you think if I called you were a narrow-minded KKK member just because you are white and Christian? Probably not true and also never nice. I suggest you get some education on what you have to talk about before you go bashing everyone. Get the facts first!
Perhaps you missed the expose last year about what was being preached in mosques in the UK? islam very much preaches violence and as a result of that, the world is currently in turmoil. I'd say you were not keeping up with the times. neo nazis have aligned with islam. Do you not recall david duke in Iran with the holocaust denial conference? I have the facts. I'm the worst kind of infidel...an informed one.
But you claimed that i admitted i supported them. I guess you were wrong. Glad you could admit, Finally, To lying. Shame you had to expose yourself and suffer the embarrassment first though. Apology accepted.
You have. Would you like to change that position now? There's still time to acknowledge you are against al qaida using mentally handicapped children as suicide bombers. Any particular reason you haven't?
You have claimed such. You don't remember? We've had the same discussion before and Lorien reminded you about how you support terrorists using children as suicide bombers. And you were perfectly fine with it. Even more disturbing, you actually admitted twice to supporting terrorists: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=3464145&postcount=24 That is an acknowledgement of support. Attempting to take the high moral ground by supporting terrorists using children as suicide bombers, over something else. Now we get to the good one: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=3467367&postcount=37 Once again, admitting support of terrorists by acknowledging you defend their cause. Defense is support. Same topic, ironically. Here's the beginning of where it gets good: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=366176&highlight=hamas&page=2 Yes, I accept your apology and I accept melbel's apology as well. For he/she was probably not aware of your previous admissions of supporting terrorists.
They were threads about hamas not "al qaida", Dumbass. Oh wait, brown, Muslim, All the same right? Second Time you have proven yourself to be a filthy little liar in one day. Again, Thanks for doing the leg work and getting the quotes for me. I would say talking to you is like beating a dead horse, But it's really more like sitting down and watching the dead horse beat it's self.
Incorrect again. hamas is not in Iraq using children as suicide bombers. al qaida is in Iraq, using children as suicide bombers. Of which I've pointed out, and of which you clearly admitted to supporting. Try again. Thanks for challenging me to pull up some of your old posts where you clearly admit to supporting terrorists. Now everyone can see the real you.
lmao that's what i'm saying you clown. The threads you quoted me in were about hamas and Israel. But then you posted the quotes as "evidence" that i support "al qaida" in Iraq. You really are as thick as pig shit. You don't even know what you are talking about. The countries, The leaders, The groups, It's just a big brown Muslim blur to you now isn't it? Moron.
No, you're trying to weasel out of it. And a very poor job. Both hamas, and al qaida using children in Iraq were in discussion. when you said: In response to Lorien, what was the discussion about and which terrorist group were you admitting was better to support? I'll guide you through it, since a) you are being dishonest now that you've been caught, or 2) you just really are that dumb. Which option works best for you?
let's go, stock boy. It's not a tough answer and I don't have all night for you to make up a new lie. let's go, you can spit it out when you know the answer.
Don't you realize that people can look at the threads themselves? Neither myself or anyone else in the thread mentioned "al qaida", So i don't see how you posting those quotes helps you in any way. it's just solidifies everyones growing suspicious that you are nothing more than a filthy liar. I know it must be hard if you can't even help inciminating yourself and proving my point with practically every post you make, But it's time to give up, You are making a complete and utter fool of yourself. You are desperately posting quotes hoping that people aren't going to check their context, Well guess what, People do check, And they can see you are a liar who is too dumb to even see the difference between hamas in Lebanon and "al qaida" in Iraq. You are a pathological liar.
Setting aside the call for support in a desparate situation and exemplary demonstration of projectionism... Once again, when you said: In response to Lorien, what was the discussion about and which terrorist group were you admitting was better to support?
Do you have the "facts" GTech, so Neo Nazis have aligned with Islam, LOL ??? Why are you a Nixon Nazi then ?? LOL man, you are just figuring that out, I have been telling this forum that since GTech joined here!! You have GTech pegged right Stox, he is very easy to figure out, it is plain to see what he really is, he has an entire gang of kids following his flawed logic here and trading reputation back and fourth too, GTech is just trying to pick up where his propagandist hero Jerry Falwell left off man !!!! Who is responsible for the terror GTech, could it be Bush Senior for letting Saddam walk in the first battle of this 16 year war that we lost GTech ??? GTech is going to be the last Nixon lover standing, most Republican lawmakers are turning against his hero's in the White House for fear of losing their jobs, Cheney is looking to be impeached and Republicans are going to lead that charge very soon, as they did with Nixon! GTech lost this debate long ago but still thinks he is winning !!!
Isn't it a well known fact that the Baath party of Iraq was a nazi-fundamentalist offshoot for Hitler's control over the Middle East? Just google the now "taking a dirt nap" saddam's Baath party heros to get an idea as to what was really going on in the Middle east right before and after WWII. Here is an essential read for all of you liberals not really knowing the "facts" http://www.eretzyisroel.org/~jkatz/baath.html
Kind of funny, we have Nixon loving Republicans who follow the Nazi business plan calling Muslims Nazis, LOL Muslims did not kill the Jews in WWII in Germany, "so called Christians" were responsible for this, the same people responsible for todays "war on terror". PS: We thought Muslims and Islamists were Nobel warriors when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan and the CIA armed them and they expelled them with our help, now the shoe is on the other foot and Russia under Putin is supporting them against us, Bush and Cheney have made Putin the most powerful man on earth and there is nothing anyone can do to reverse this process brought about by greed and lust for oil, these idiots played a master chess players game and Putin won.
Who said Russia under the putin is Supporting terrorists We and Russia have been against Terrorists but only now after sept 11 ,you joined with us! in the war against Terror We have been telling you that Terrorism is very dangerous to support but in the name of so called Democracy you supported terrorism and now you are paying for it!
I really don't know who you think you're talking to pal, but you better pull your head out of the sand, then educate yourself before you debate me!
Welcome back. I'm flattered that you specifically sought me out to make your first post to and even more flattered that you have patiently been waiting here like a good boy! Even more interesting is who you've selected as your new best friend upon returning from DP Gitmo. Someone who openly admist to supporting terrorists. You two have a lot in common Will it be 24 or 48 hours this time?